2018
DOI: 10.12669/pjms.35.1.28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common reasons for not accepting manuscripts for further processing after editor’s triage and initial screening

Abstract: How to cite this:Jawaid SA, Jawaid M. Common reasons for not accepting manuscripts for further processing after editor’s triage and initial screening. Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35(1):1-3. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.1.28 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical (STM) Publishers ( 6 ), around 42,500 scientific peer-reviewed English and non-English language journals actively contribute to publish scientific works; considering such a huge number of journals, choosing the right one to submit a manuscript is not easy ( 4 ). Choosing the wrong journal may lead to fast rejection, delayed publication, and waste of time/resources ( 7 , 8 ). Targeting the best journal has no clear-cut criteria or a practical model; it is a complex issue, compounded by the increasing numbers of journals and the emerging changes in the publishing landscape ( 8 , 9 ).…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical (STM) Publishers ( 6 ), around 42,500 scientific peer-reviewed English and non-English language journals actively contribute to publish scientific works; considering such a huge number of journals, choosing the right one to submit a manuscript is not easy ( 4 ). Choosing the wrong journal may lead to fast rejection, delayed publication, and waste of time/resources ( 7 , 8 ). Targeting the best journal has no clear-cut criteria or a practical model; it is a complex issue, compounded by the increasing numbers of journals and the emerging changes in the publishing landscape ( 8 , 9 ).…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The manuscript needs to be relevant and fit within the “Aims and Scope” of the journal. Not falling within the scope of the journal (~11%) and irrelevant topic to the journal mission (~37%) are some of the most common reasons for a fast rejection in the field of medicine ( 7 , 56 ). Prior to submission, authors are therefore encouraged to carefully read the journal’s mission/vision statement and be familiar with the topics and types of manuscripts published by the journal ( 56 ).…”
Section: Factors Affecting Journal Targetingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Up to 80% of the submissions are not processed further and are rejected early on within a few days without an external review. 2,3 Most journals have elaborate details in author guidelines for the preparation of manuscripts to avoid this. Also, editors and reviewers spend lots of time in various forms of training to help authors improve their scientific writing and publication skills.…”
Section: Editorialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a clearly laid down criteria for authorship by International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and most good quality peer review journals follow this with little bit of modification 10. Hence, those submitting the manuscripts have to be very careful as regards authorship and enlist only those as authors who are eligible for authorship otherwise they risk their manuscripts being rejected from most reputed peer reviewed biomedical journals 11…”
Section: Publication Auditmentioning
confidence: 99%