2014
DOI: 10.5624/isd.2014.44.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common positioning errors in panoramic radiography: A review

Abstract: Professionals performing radiographic examinations are responsible for maintaining optimal image quality for accurate diagnoses. These professionals must competently execute techniques such as film manipulation and processing to minimize patient exposure to radiation. Improper performance by the professional and/or patient may result in a radiographic image of unsatisfactory quality that can also lead to a misdiagnosis and the development of an inadequate treatment plan. Currently, the most commonly performed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
50
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The Frankfort plane was positioned parallel to the ground and the median sagittal plane was perpendicular to the ground. 38 All obtained images were exported as TIFF (Tagged Image File Format), 300 dpi, and subsequently imported into the MATLAB R2016a program (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United States). In order to calculate measurement errors, the study reliability was conducted through image evaluation during a 15-day interval.…”
Section: Obtaining and Evaluating Of Digital Panoramic Radiographsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Frankfort plane was positioned parallel to the ground and the median sagittal plane was perpendicular to the ground. 38 All obtained images were exported as TIFF (Tagged Image File Format), 300 dpi, and subsequently imported into the MATLAB R2016a program (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United States). In order to calculate measurement errors, the study reliability was conducted through image evaluation during a 15-day interval.…”
Section: Obtaining and Evaluating Of Digital Panoramic Radiographsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gumussoy et al 35 reported a reduced mean fractal dimension value in a group of 25 patients with chronic renal failure in comparison to healthy individuals. In patients with temporomandibular disorders-related osteoarthritic changes fractal dimension value decreased as the severity of degenerative changesincreased, showing that erosive and sclerotic condyles had an altered trabecular pattern 38.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Artifacts could occur due to I)technical errors, II)improper patient positioning and III)during x-ray exposure in digital panoramic imaging [58][59][60].…”
Section: Artifacts In Digital Panoramic Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, neither the data collection criteria of each manufacturer nor the method of creating the average arch shape and focal trough is publicly available. Lack of agreement in the focal trough can be an obstacle to the standardization of panoramic radiography, and the consequent variation in images may affect the diagnostic accuracy in multiple ways 11 , 12 . First, different magnification across brands results in different measurements of the same anatomical structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%