SIRS, We read with interest the letter by Dr Sand, 1 which raises some methodological concerns about our metaanalysis. 2 The main concern refers to the lack of strand information in some primary publications, which could lead to allele misassignment.First, all studies performed in Caucasians included in our meta-analysis reported G as the minor allele, which is also the minor allele for the forward strand in the dbSNP database and in other reports. 3 The comparison of observed allele frequencies with public databases is a common approach when transversion polymorphisms are analysed and strand information is uncertain, 4, 5 and works particularly well when minor allele frequency is below 0.40, as happens with rs738409 polymorphism. Therefore, data consistency regarding minor allele frequencies between studies, and with other reports, makes the risk of allele misassignment very low.Second, several publications report to have analysed this polymorphism on the forward strand, 6-8 and no study, to the best of our knowledge, specifically reports to have analysed it on the reverse strand.Finally, our results are consistent with several other meta-analyses that showed the G allele in the forward strand of this polymorphism as a risk factor for advanced liver disease. 3, 9, 10 Although we agree that allele assignment is a theoretical concern when transversions are analysed, this does not invalidate previous meta-analyses on this field.Regarding potential differences in genotype counts between primary studies and our work, the study by Dr Way et al. has been presented so far as abstracts and we referenced one of them 11 although detailed genotype counts were available in the other. 12 We apologise for this potential source of confusion, which does not affect our results. Besides, additional data were kindly provided by Dr Falleti et al., 13 as we had already stated in the methodology of our paper. Therefore, this concern is overcome.In summary, it seems clear that our meta-analysis does not need extensive remastering. Of course, further research in this field will be greatly welcome.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTThe authors' declarations of personal and financial interests are unchanged from those in the original article. 2