“…That said, extant measures that employ count report formats may inadvertently bias reports to favor particular frequency ranges by suggesting count metrics (e.g., 1, 5, 15 in Cerutti, Zuffianò, & Spensieri, 2018;0, 10, 100, 500 in Nielsen, Sayal, & Townsend, 2017). Similarly, studies of NSSI vary with regard to duration, with some studies assessing NSSI events during the prior year as in the current study (e.g., Hasking et al, 2019;Muehlenkamp, Xhunga, & Brausch, 2019), in the past month (e.g., Auerbach et al, 2014;Fox et al, 2019), or over the course of the respondent's life time (e.g., Cerutti et al, 2018). It is not yet clear if and how these variations may influence NSSI distributions and, by extension, the relative effectiveness of statistical approaches for addressing data skewness.…”