2015
DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common Neural Correlates of Intertemporal Choices and Intelligence in Adolescents

Abstract: Converging behavioral evidence indicates that temporal discounting, measured by intertemporal choice tasks, is inversely related to intelligence. At the neural level, the parieto-frontal network is pivotal for complex, higher-order cognitive processes. Relatedly, underrecruitment of the pFC during a working memory task has been found to be associated with steeper temporal discounting. Furthermore, this network has also been shown to be related to the consistency of intertemporal choices. Here we report an fMRI… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 ; n = 206, Ripke et al . 56 , cognitive control task, n = 184, Mennigen et al . 17 , Rodehacke et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22 ; n = 206, Ripke et al . 56 , cognitive control task, n = 184, Mennigen et al . 17 , Rodehacke et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this paradigm, ROIs of the fusiform gyrus, the superior parietal lobe as well as the ACC were created by using the overlap of functional activation of the intertemporal decision phase 22, 56 and anatomical regions using the WFU-PickAtlas with the AAL atlas. The overlap with anatomical regions was necessary to create distinct ROIs because the activation spanned one very large cluster across the whole brain.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First-level statistical analysis was based on least-squares estimation using a GLM, as in previous studies that employed the task [23,40,49,50,53]. The main model consisted of the two regressors of primary interest-(1) onsets of delayed rewards, (2) subjective value of the delayed reward as a parametric modulator of regressor 1.…”
Section: Fmri Acquisition Processing and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…broad range of maladaptive behaviors, principally in young individuals (Story, Vlaev, Seymour, Darzi, & Conversely, high risk aversion (taken as the other extreme of the risk spectrum), as well as high loss aversion (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979), might indicate a negative learning bias that increases the risk of depression and anx iety disorders (Smoski et al, 2008). On the neural level, task-based fMRI experiments and le sion studies have shown the brain circuitry underlying some of the behaviors mentioned above: Frontostriatal regions (i.e., medial prefrontal cortex, ventral striatum) are implicated in valuation processes and reinforcement learning (Bartra, McGuire, & Kable, 2013;Peters & Buchel, 2011;Ripke et al, 2012;Rushworth, Noonan, Boorman, Walton, & Behrens, 2011), whereas the so-called cognitive control net work (i.e., posterior parietal cortex, lateral prefrontal cortex, anterior insula, and anterior cingulate cortex) was associated with the decision phase during intertemporal and probabilistic choices (Marco-Pallarés, Mohammadi, Samii, & Münte, 2010;McClure, Laibson, Loewenstein, & Cohen, 2004;Ripke et al, 2015;Ripke et al, 2012;Weber & Huettel, 2008). Additionally, developmental neuroimaging studies have postulated that stronger activation of regions involved in reward processing (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%