2013
DOI: 10.3109/00016489.2013.795288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common molecular etiology of patients with nonsyndromic hearing loss in Tibetan, Tu nationality, and Mongolian patients in the northwest of China

Abstract: The mutant allele rate of GJB2 gene was 6.2% in Tibetan and 11.22% in Tu nationality patients, c.235delC was the most prevalent mutation, accounting for 75% of the mutant GJB2 alleles. Mutant allele frequency of SLC26A4 in Tibetan, Tu nationality, and Mongolian subjects was 4.54%, 6.12%, and 15.79% respectively; p.IVS7-2A>G was the most common form. Mongolian cases were significantly higher than Tibetan cases (χ² = 7.281, p = 0.007 and p < 0.05). mtDNA A1555G mutation was detected in six Tibetan, five Tu natio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study was consistent with previous reports suggesting that SLC26A4 mutations account for 4-17% of inherited deafness cases (Guo et al, 2008;Qu et al, 2012;Xin et al, 2013;Yang et al, 2013). As expected, c.IVS7-2A > G was the most common SLC26A4 gene mutation.…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our study was consistent with previous reports suggesting that SLC26A4 mutations account for 4-17% of inherited deafness cases (Guo et al, 2008;Qu et al, 2012;Xin et al, 2013;Yang et al, 2013). As expected, c.IVS7-2A > G was the most common SLC26A4 gene mutation.…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Only one boy with 10 years old harbored the m.1555A>G homoplasmic mutation in our study, according for 0.26% (1/380) and none of the mutations were found in the control group. The frequency mutation of 12S rRNA in our result was lower than 51.11% in Northern Chinese subjects reported by Guo's group [18],also lower than the northwest of China [19]. This may be related to a majority of our patients group were congenital and prelingual deafness.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Taking into account the complexity of ethnic history of Tuvinians, it remains unclear, who actually were the c.516G>C founders—different ancient Turkic- or Mongolic-speaking groups or other aboriginal peoples who lived there. The introduction of c.516G>C into Tuva territory with migration flows of ancient Mongolic-speaking groups is not consistent with the finding of c.516G>C in only one deaf patient from Mongolia [ 14 , 59 ] as well as with its absence in Mongolian patients living in China [ 60 , 61 ]. It is known that several nomadic Tuvinian groups roamed in the past across the territories of Tuva and Mongolia had remained in Mongolia when Tuva was separated from Mongolia to become under Russian protectorate after the breakup of the Qing Empire in 1911–1912 [ 54 , 55 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%