2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10834-016-9511-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common Law Marriage and Teen Births

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four states fairly recently repealed laws recognizing common law marriage (Ohio in 1991, Idaho in 1996, Georgia in 1997, and Pennsylvania in 2005) [5]. Common law marriage does not require a marriage certificate or ceremony.…”
Section: Discussion Of Pros and Consmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Four states fairly recently repealed laws recognizing common law marriage (Ohio in 1991, Idaho in 1996, Georgia in 1997, and Pennsylvania in 2005) [5]. Common law marriage does not require a marriage certificate or ceremony.…”
Section: Discussion Of Pros and Consmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is certainly possible that factors that led to increases in couple formation may also have pushed states to repeal common law marriage [5]. One of these factors may be social norms that are increasingly tolerant of cohabitation and accepting of an egalitarian division of labor within the household.…”
Section: Limitations and Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their work found that greater employment among female teenagers and men aged 20–24 was associated with higher teen birth rates, especially among disadvantaged youth. In another study, Grossbard and Vernon ( 2017 ) probed the effects of common law marriage (CLM) on teen births, using the Current Population Survey’s fertility supplements from 1990 to 2010 and vital statistics data. Comparing earlier-life childbearing in states that eliminated CLM with states that did not, the authors found a small positive effect of CLM elimination on teen births, but only among teens aged 15–17.…”
Section: Childbearing: Levels Timing and Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%