1976
DOI: 10.1094/phyto-66-542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common Hosts for Fusarium oxysporum formae speciales spinaciae and betae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This underlines the challenges spinach seed growers in the PNW face at identifying fields suitable for spin ach seed crops. Persistence of the spinach Fusarium wilt pathogen in soils in this region may reflect the ability of the fungus to colonize roots or debris of one or more crops grown in rotation with spinach (e.g., 3,4,19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This underlines the challenges spinach seed growers in the PNW face at identifying fields suitable for spin ach seed crops. Persistence of the spinach Fusarium wilt pathogen in soils in this region may reflect the ability of the fungus to colonize roots or debris of one or more crops grown in rotation with spinach (e.g., 3,4,19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formae speciales of F. oxysporum and F. solani, especially wilt-causing F. oxysporum, often exhibit pronounced host specificity (Booth, 1971). For example, formae speciales that are restricted in host range to a single species (Snyder, 1941) or to subspecific groups within a single species (Armstrong and Armstrong, 1976) have been identified. An alternative model of pathogenicity and host range would be that of F. oxysporum f. sp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…spinaciae (Sherb) Snyder & Hans. (FOS) is the pathogenic form, which causes wilt disease on plants in the Chenopodiaceae family (Armstrong and Armstrong 1976). In FOS, three vegetative compatibility groups (VCGs; 0330, 0331 and 0332) have been reported (Katan 1999;Katan and Di Primo 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No development of races based on pathogenicity on cultivars of spinach in FOS has been reported. Previously, the pathogen of sugar beet disease was proposed to be FOS race 2 (Armstrong and Armstrong 1976); however, it is generally accepted to be another form, f. sp. betae, because of its difference in host specificity (Fiely et al 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%