1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6866(1998)18:6<279::aid-tcm2>3.0.co;2-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common fragile site expression and genetic predisposition to breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, their baseline DNA damage was higher than in healthy participants. Other investigators also reported the probability that the neoplastic disease itself is associated with increased DNA damage, as well as that cancer patients have a more fragile DNA than healthy individuals (24,25). The background levels of DNA damage in leukocytes are mostly influenced by reactive oxygen species that are continuously generated under physiological conditions as an outcome of cellular metabolism, personal life-style, age, and daily environmental exposure to different mutagens (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, their baseline DNA damage was higher than in healthy participants. Other investigators also reported the probability that the neoplastic disease itself is associated with increased DNA damage, as well as that cancer patients have a more fragile DNA than healthy individuals (24,25). The background levels of DNA damage in leukocytes are mostly influenced by reactive oxygen species that are continuously generated under physiological conditions as an outcome of cellular metabolism, personal life-style, age, and daily environmental exposure to different mutagens (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observed, especially, more frequent fragile sites in FRA3B. Expression of the FRA3B-localized FHIT tumor suppressor gene was observed at very high levels in breast cancer patients and their relatives compared with controls 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…DNA-repair ability among cancer patients, the probability is that the neoplastic disease itself is associated with increased DNA damage or that these patients have a more fragile DNA than healthy individuals (Çeçener et al, 1998;Kopjar et al, 2006;Ursini et al, 2006).…”
Section: Table )2(: Comet Assay Results For Patients and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%