2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2006.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common evolutionary trends for SINE RNA structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phylogenetic trees reconstructed using geometrical and statistical characters and derived from several functional RNA molecules were congruent and similarly rooted (78,93,94). Consequently, geometrical considerations in structure appeared intimately linked to molecular order, supporting both the evolutionary model and arguments of character polarization.…”
Section: Evolution Of Rna Structurementioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Phylogenetic trees reconstructed using geometrical and statistical characters and derived from several functional RNA molecules were congruent and similarly rooted (78,93,94). Consequently, geometrical considerations in structure appeared intimately linked to molecular order, supporting both the evolutionary model and arguments of character polarization.…”
Section: Evolution Of Rna Structurementioning
confidence: 57%
“…Correlation between RNA folding and the occurrence of structural motifs in natural nucleic acids also supports tendencies towards order (86). Finally, tendencies towards order have been experimentally supported by phylogenetic congruence in the reconstruction of rooted trees generated from sequence, structure, and genomic rearrangements (see below) at different taxonomical levels (78,(87)(88)(89)(90)(91)(92)(93)(94). Note that order is seldom achieved in frustrated systems that are driven by the energetics of conformation and stability, such as RNA or proteins.…”
Section: Universal Tendencies Towards Molecular Ordermentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Their copy number ranges from a few hundred to more than a million. Most eukaryotic SINEs are ancestrally derived from tRNA genes (and in rare cases from 7SL or 5S RNAs), although the typical tRNA cloverleaf structure is not apparent anymore for most SINE RNAs (Sun et al 2007). SINEs derived from tRNAs usually have a composite structure made of a 59 tRNArelated portion followed by a tRNA-unrelated portion (Okada and Ohshima 1995;Deragon and Zhang 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a few exceptions (Matsumoto et al 1986;Lin et al 2001), the majority of SINEs derived from tRNAs do not fold as their ancestral tRNA molecule and it was recently shown that most tRNA-related SINEs have very similar RNA structures (Rozhdestvensky et al 2001;Sun et al 2007). Remarkably, when the intron is spliced, SINEX-3_CR, SINEX-5_CR, and SINEX-6_CR tRNA-related sequences can be folded in the theoretical cloverleaf structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumes the accumulation of changes from the original structure. For instance, transcripts of simple tRNA-derived SINEs cannot form the clover leaf structure, and their nucleotides are not modified as in tRNAs (Rozhdestvensky et al, 2007;Sun et al, 2007). As a result of such changes, SINE transcripts lose the capacity to bind to at least some protein factors of tRNA processing or transport.…”
Section: Reverse Transcriptional Competencementioning
confidence: 99%