1986
DOI: 10.1099/00207713-36-3-426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common Deoxyribonucleic Acid Sequences in Mycoplasma genitalium and Mycoplasma pneumoniae Genomes

Abstract: Southern blot hybridization of digested deoxyribonucleic acids (DNAs) of Mycoplasma ,genitalium, M . pneumoniae, and M . gallisepticum with probes made of total DNA of any one of these mycoplasmas revealed hybridization bands additional to those containing ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) gene sequences, which were identifiable by specific rRNA gene probes. The number and intensity of these additional bands were most pronounced with the M . genitalium-M. pneumoniae pair, which shares major antigenic determina… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

1989
1989
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(9 reference statements)
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Immunoblots show marked serological cross-reactivity between M. genitalium and M . pneumoniae cell proteins, supported by the significant sharing of genomic sequences between the two mycoplasmas (Yogev & Razin, 1986). Yet, despite the marked relatedness to M. pneumoniae, there is no doubt that M. genitalium deserves the status of a separate species.…”
Section: The Organisms Studiedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Immunoblots show marked serological cross-reactivity between M. genitalium and M . pneumoniae cell proteins, supported by the significant sharing of genomic sequences between the two mycoplasmas (Yogev & Razin, 1986). Yet, despite the marked relatedness to M. pneumoniae, there is no doubt that M. genitalium deserves the status of a separate species.…”
Section: The Organisms Studiedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, despite the marked relatedness to M. pneumoniae, there is no doubt that M. genitalium deserves the status of a separate species. This is based on the significant difference in genomic DNA content [about 33mol% guanine + cytosine (G + C) in M. genitalium, compared to 40 mol% in M. pneumoniae], DNA homology values between the two mycoplasmas lower than 8% (Yogev & Razin, 1986), totally different genomic cleavage patterns of the two organisms ) and a marked difference in genome size. While the values reported for the M. pneumoniae genome are in the 800 kb range (Wenzel & Herrmann, 1989;Krause & Mawn, 1990;) the genome of M. genitalium is less than 600 kb in size Colman et al, 1990b), the smallest genome recorded for any mycoplasma and, in fact, for a self-replicating organism.…”
Section: The Organisms Studiedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1A). The DNA targets were total DNA populations from M. pneumoniae and various other species generally found in the human respiratory tract and from M. genitalium, which is the closest known organism to M. pneumoniae (22). The MP5 clone gave a positive hybridization signal only with M. pneumoniae DNA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both species have several common features such as glucose fermentation, complex nutritional requirements, and adherence of erythrocytes to the colonies. Genomic homology of DNAs between both strains analyzed by DNA-DNA hybridization was only 1.8 to 8% (10,19), suggested that M. genitalium might have evolved independently of other human mycoplasma species, including M. pneumoniae (5). It has been demonstrated that monoclonal antibody (MAb) specific to the P1 protein (168 kDa) which is the major adhesin of M. pneumoniae cross-reacted with 100 kDa protein which is a putative adhesin of M. genitalium (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mycoplasma genitalium and Mycoplasma pneumoniae are genetically (4,19) and serologically (2, 3, 9-11, 16, 20) close-related organisms that colonize in humans. M. genitalium is rarely isolated from human urethral specimens (12,18) and recently from throat specimens of military recruits (1), but the pathogenicity of this organism has not been assessed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%