Common core writing and language standards and aligned state assessments: a national survey of teacher beliefs and attitudes

Abstract

A random sample of 482 teachers in grades 3 through 8 from across the United States were surveyed about (a) their perceptions of the version of the Common Core writing and language standards adopted by their state and their state's writing assessment, (b) their preparation to teach writing, and (c) their selfefficacy beliefs for teaching writing. Regardless of grade, a majority of teachers believed that the adopted standards are more rigorous than prior standards, provide clear expectations for students that can be straightforwardly translated into activities and lessons, and have pushed them to address writing more often. However, many surveyed felt the new writing and language standards are too numerous to cover, omit key aspects of writing development, and may be inappropriate for struggling writers. Moreover, most did not feel that professional development efforts have been sufficient to achieve successful implementation, and nearly one in five respondents was not familiar with the standards. The respondents were generally less sanguine regarding their state's writing test, with elementary teachers even less positive than middle school teachers on some aspects, though nearly a third were unfamiliar with their state test. A majority believed state writing tests, though more rigorous than prior tests, fail to address important aspects of writing development, do not accommodate the needs of students with diverse abilities, and require more time than is available to prepare students. Additionally, many teachers believed professional development efforts have been insufficient to help them understand measurement properties of the assessments and how to use test data to identify students' writing needs. Teachers who were better prepared to teach writing and

Teacher Implementation of College- and Career-Readiness Standards: Links Among Policy, Instruction, Challenges, and Resources

“…The best-designed standards policy matters little if its primary implementers, teachers, have wholly different interpretations (H. C. Hill, 2001;Spillane, 2009). Contemporaneous surveys show that even several years after adoption, most teachers felt that they still had not received adequate professional development on how to teach the standards (Troia & Graham, 2016). It is therefore of critical importance to examine teacher perspectives on the resources and supports they receive related to implementing standards, the instructional challenges they face, and whether these factors influence their use of standards in the classroom.…”

Reflective Journaling: A Portal Into the Virtues of Daily Writing

“…Often, in grades 2–6, writing instruction tends to focus on essay preparation for state tests. Troia and Graham (), in a teacher survey, discovered that “many surveyed felt the new writing and language standards for Common Core are too numerous to cover, omit key aspects of writing development, and may be inappropriate for struggling writers” (p. 1719). Additionally, Ohle () stated that teachers often feel overburdened by implementing new curriculum policy and, as a result, were less likely to adopt new curricular practices.…”

Teaching cursive handwriting: A contribution to the acceptability study of using digital tablets in French classrooms

“…The survey's form and content were inspired by existing surveys (Bara et al, 2011;Labrecque et al, 2013Paoletti, 1994Troia and Graham, 2016), and the categories proposed in the multiple choice questions were based on current scientific knowledge on emergent writing and reading skills (Bara and Bonneton-Botté, 2017;Puranik et al, 2011Puranik et al, , 2014. A first exploratory questionnaire had been conducted with 60 teachers one year previously (Bonneton-Botté et al, in press).…”