2013
DOI: 10.1177/193229681300700428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common Causes of Glucose Oxidase Instability in In Vivo Biosensing: A Brief Review

Abstract: Abbreviations: (CBD) chitin-binding domain, (ELP) elastin-like polypeptide, (GAX) glutaraldehyde cross-linking, (GOx) AbstractClinical management of diabetes must overcome the challenge of in vivo glucose sensors exhibiting lifetimes of only a few days. Limited sensor life originates from compromised enzyme stability of the sensing enzyme. Sensing enzymes degrade in the presence of low molecular weight materials (LMWM) and hydrogen peroxide in vivo. Sensing enzymes could be made to withstand these degradati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that the presence of the Aga2 protein at the N-terminus of GOx affects its enzymatic activity. Alternatively, the higher surface density of GOx in case of pCTCON may result in lower observed activity due to local depletion of oxygen or inactivation of GOx due to local accumulation of hydrogen peroxide, as observed in the case of sensors employing immobilized GOx 3436 . However, further investigation into the apparent decrease in enzymatic activity of surface displayed GOx when the pCTCON vector is used is outside the scope of this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that the presence of the Aga2 protein at the N-terminus of GOx affects its enzymatic activity. Alternatively, the higher surface density of GOx in case of pCTCON may result in lower observed activity due to local depletion of oxygen or inactivation of GOx due to local accumulation of hydrogen peroxide, as observed in the case of sensors employing immobilized GOx 3436 . However, further investigation into the apparent decrease in enzymatic activity of surface displayed GOx when the pCTCON vector is used is outside the scope of this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation of these CV curves during continuous cycling indicated the CoHCF!CoO x transformation process involved different and simultaneous electrochemical process on NPG surface. The initial process involved the transformation of CoHCF to more stable Co(OH) 2 Fig. 1C.…”
Section: Preparation and Electrochemical Characterization Of Coo X /Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is based on enzymes that can specifically catalyze glucose (enzymatic glucose sensors) and the other is based on the direct electrooxidization of glucose on electrode materials (nonenzymatic glucose sensors). Enzymatic glucose sensors are easily affected by environmental changes due to the inherent drawbacks of enzymes and the immobilization procedures are usually time-consuming [1,2]. Therefore, much effort has been devoted to the development of enzyme-free glucose sensors with excellent analytical performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, many factors may degrade the glucose oxidase structure following by a decrease of sensor activity. Hydrogen peroxide, unstable temperature, blood low molecular weight materials, and interstitial fluids are the major reasons for biosensor instability (Harris, Reyes, and Lopez 2013). Hydrogen peroxide produced during reaction catalyzed by glucose oxidase is the most frequent factor of glucose oxidase degradation (Ferri, Kojima, and Sode 2011).…”
Section: Biorecognition Elements Of Glucose Biosensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%