2016
DOI: 10.1183/20734735.006416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common causes of dyspnoea in athletes: a practical approach for diagnosis and management

Abstract: Key points“Dyspnoea” during exercise is a common complaint in seemingly otherwise healthy athletes, which may be associated with fatigue and underperformance.Because dyspnoea is an general term and may be caused by numerous factors, ranging from poor aerobic fitness to serious, potentially fatal respiratory and nonrespiratory pathologies, it is important for clinicians to obtain an appropriate case history and ask relevant exercise-specific questions to fully characterise the nature of the complaint so that a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
(158 reference statements)
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The observation of falls in FVC directs the attention to phenomena other than EIB that cause exercise-induced dyspnoea. The possibilities range from athletes reaching their physiological limits (deconditioned or unfit athletes), organic pathologies other than EIB, functional or structural forms of dysfunctional breathing and other pulmonary and non-pulmonary pathologies (arrhythmia, intracardiac shunts) 34 , 35 . The field test may be particularly prone to blur the picture of EIB in athletes who may have even sprinted to the finish line and also present with fatigue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observation of falls in FVC directs the attention to phenomena other than EIB that cause exercise-induced dyspnoea. The possibilities range from athletes reaching their physiological limits (deconditioned or unfit athletes), organic pathologies other than EIB, functional or structural forms of dysfunctional breathing and other pulmonary and non-pulmonary pathologies (arrhythmia, intracardiac shunts) 34 , 35 . The field test may be particularly prone to blur the picture of EIB in athletes who may have even sprinted to the finish line and also present with fatigue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An estimated 20%–40% of otherwise healthy runners experience EID even at low absolute exercise intensities ( Johansson et al, 2015 ; Smoliga et al, 2016 ; Ersson et al, 2020 ). This could be because unfit or deconditioned individuals may approach high levels of exertion and experience limb fatigue at low absolute workloads ( Abu-Hasan et al, 2005 ).…”
Section: Respiration During Exercisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…During high intensity exercise, large increases in ventilatory flow may cause narrowing of the airway related to the Venturi effect and Bernoulli principle, among other constraints. This is termed “exercise-induced largyngeal obstruction,” and it is particularly common in elite athletes who generate large V E at high intensities ( Smoliga et al, 2016 ). Up to 20% of elite athletes, females, adolescents, and overweight individuals may experience this during low-intensity activity ( Smith et al, 2017 ; Dempsey et al, 2020 ; Ersson et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Respiration During Exercisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher cardiorespiratory fitness seen in the previous study’s participants may not justify the lower range of %CTT values when compared to the present study because individuals with excellent aerobic fitness do not usually show dyspnea during exercise without any evidence of pathology. Instead, they are usually well accustomed to the ventilatory demands of exercise Smoliga et al (2016) , and thus may show greater utterance output with a higher %CTT than individuals with poor fitness. However, the cardiorespiratory fitness in the participants of the present study was limited due to estimation from a non-exercise test model with cross validity between 0.72 and 0.8 ( Jurca et al, 2005 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%