2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common and differential electrophysiological mechanisms underlying semantic object memory retrieval probed by features presented in different stimulus types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to HA, the YA group showed differences across conditions after 500 ms post-stimulus onset in theta and alpha frequency power. In particular, consistent with our prior findings within similar time windows (Chiang et al, 2016;Ferree et al, 2009;Hart et al, 2013), YA demonstrated increased alpha ERD during retrieval compared to non-retrieval conditions, which might be linked to semantic integration of features which lead to object memory activation. In the subsequent time window (628 to 701 ms post-stimulus onset), YA had higher theta ERS during non-retrieval compared to retrieval conditions, which might be related to enhanced search for potential feature integration prior to making a final judgment (Yes/No response on button push).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to HA, the YA group showed differences across conditions after 500 ms post-stimulus onset in theta and alpha frequency power. In particular, consistent with our prior findings within similar time windows (Chiang et al, 2016;Ferree et al, 2009;Hart et al, 2013), YA demonstrated increased alpha ERD during retrieval compared to non-retrieval conditions, which might be linked to semantic integration of features which lead to object memory activation. In the subsequent time window (628 to 701 ms post-stimulus onset), YA had higher theta ERS during non-retrieval compared to retrieval conditions, which might be related to enhanced search for potential feature integration prior to making a final judgment (Yes/No response on button push).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These tests were performed to assess (1) normal aging effects by comparing YA to HA groups and (2) pathological aging effects by comparing HA to MCI groups, for all electrodes (N = 62) and all windows (N = 26) spanning from 188 to 1105 ms post stimulus onset. We chose this time window given that prior studies have shown effects within this time window on the SORT task (Chiang et al, 2014(Chiang et al, , 2015(Chiang et al, , 2016(Chiang et al, , 2020. A False Discovery Rate (FDR) < 0.05 from permutation tests was considered significant, which is a robust statistical approach commonly adopted in functional imaging studies to avoid excessive false negative results, so further corrections for multiple comparisons were not applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Electroencephalogram (EEG), with its millisecond temporal resolution and direct measure of post-synaptic neuronal activity, is a useful tool to study neural dynamics associated with semantic memory (Chiang et al, 2016(Chiang et al, , 2020. Previously, on the EEG-based SORT, we observed differences in event-related potentials (ERPs) between (1) cognitively normal younger and older adults and (2) individuals with MCI and cognitively normal older controls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%