2018
DOI: 10.1002/agr.21564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commodity price volatility and U.S. monetary policy: Commodity price overshooting revisited

Abstract: Commodity price volatility has created concerns for central bank policy-makers. Recent commodity prices peaked in the consequences of the financial crisis of 2007, and they have remained relatively volatile since. As they are often seen as being connected in a cause and effect relationship with inflation and real output, the driving forces behind commodity price volatility are necessary for the conduct of monetary policy. Using an autoregressive moving average with an exponential generalized autoregressive con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to Brueckner et al (2012), we considered crude oil price as one of the control variables. We assumed that changes in the crude oil price have direct effects on global commodity prices and indirect effects on the exchange rates as these commodities are traded in terms of US dollars (Siami-Namini et al , 2019; Siami-Namini, 2019). We employed data on openness to international trade (% GDP) following Acemoglu et al (2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to Brueckner et al (2012), we considered crude oil price as one of the control variables. We assumed that changes in the crude oil price have direct effects on global commodity prices and indirect effects on the exchange rates as these commodities are traded in terms of US dollars (Siami-Namini et al , 2019; Siami-Namini, 2019). We employed data on openness to international trade (% GDP) following Acemoglu et al (2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High ARCH parameters imply high short-run volatility, whilst high GARCH parameters indicate high long-run volatility returns (Siami-Namini et al, 2019). The results from the EGARCH model estimations clearly show that the volatility processes of the agricultural commodities return in question is dominated by the ARCH and GARCH effect for two-time periods, but the impact of ARCH and GRACH effect have increased for the post-crisis period.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Overall, a negative return (or shocks) for the asymmetric effect parameter, γ i , shows a greater impact on future volatility than positive returns (shocks), and a positive sign shows that a positive shock has a higher impact on future volatility than negative shocks. In the other words, positive and negative shocks have asymmetric effects with positive shocks increasing volatility more than a negative shock (Siami-Namini et al, 2019). For example, corn and soybean oil has a non-significant negative and significant positive return for the pre-and post-crisis period, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a time‐varying causal test, Zhang, Liu, Hang, and Yao (2018) obtained a conclusion that there was a causal relationship from money supply to commodity price fluctuations. García and Mejía (2018) and Siami‐Namini, Hudson, Trindade, and Lyford (2019) got a similar conclusion that monetary policy changes are closely related to commodity price fluctuations. International oil price fluctuations. Coronado, Rojas, Romero‐Meza, Serletis, and Chiu (2018) used the nonlinear Granger test to investigate the impact of international oil price fluctuations on US agricultural commodity prices.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 67%