2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpdc.2005.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commodity cluster-based parallel processing of hyperspectral imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
121
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
121
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Update the MEI at each pixel using the SAM between the maximum and the minimum. As shown in previous work [2], computational complexity is ( )…”
Section: Morphological Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Update the MEI at each pixel using the SAM between the maximum and the minimum. As shown in previous work [2], computational complexity is ( )…”
Section: Morphological Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…1). This imager is able to continuously produce snapshot image cubes of tens or even hundreds of kilometers long, each of them with hundreds of MB in size, and this explosion in the amount of collected information has rapidly introduced new processing challenges [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the huge computational demands, parallel and distributed solutions are essential, at all levels of granularity. As a result, in the last decade the use of compute clusters for applications in remote sensing has become commonplace [38]. These approaches are proven beneficial for a diversity of problems, including target detection and classification [35], and automatic spectral unmixing and endmember extraction [37].…”
Section: Remote Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Worse, with the integration of many-core technologies (e.g., GPUs), programming complexity is increased even further. As most MMCA researchers are not also HPC or many-core computing experts, there is a need for user transparent programming models and tools [2][3][4][5][6] that can assist in creating efficient parallel and hierarchical MMCA applications. Ideally, such tools require little or no extra effort compared to traditional (sequential) MMCA tools, and lead to efficient execution in most application scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing user transparent programming tools are based on a software library of pre-parallelized compute kernels that cover the bulk of all commonly applied MMCA functionality [2][3][4][5][6][7]. These tools, however, all aim at data parallel execution on traditional clusters, and do not incorporate the use of many-cores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%