2011
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.resource.012809.104220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commodity Booms and Busts

Abstract: Periodically, the global economy experiences great commodity booms and busts, characterized by a broad and sharp comovement of commodity prices. There have been two such episodes since the Korean War. The first event peaked in 1974 and the second in 2008, 34 years apart. Both created major economic and political shocks, including fallen governments and human suffering due to high food prices. Each occurrence raised serious concerns over food and energy security and led to more government intervention in the co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This explanation may conjure up images of burning oil fields, but actually there was no fighting in any of the Arab oil-5 In related work, Carter, Rausser and Smith (2011) conclude that similar results hold for commodity prices more generally, noting that commodity price booms over the last four decades have been preceded by unusually high economic growth.…”
Section: The 1973/74 Oil Crisismentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This explanation may conjure up images of burning oil fields, but actually there was no fighting in any of the Arab oil-5 In related work, Carter, Rausser and Smith (2011) conclude that similar results hold for commodity prices more generally, noting that commodity price booms over the last four decades have been preceded by unusually high economic growth.…”
Section: The 1973/74 Oil Crisismentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This growth spurs demand for commodities and raises commodity prices. In a review article (Carter, Rausser and Smith, 2011), we show that both the 1973-74 and 2007-08 commodity booms were preceded by unusually high world economic growth, especially in middle-income countries. Baumeister and Kilian (2014) show that corn prices are correlated with the price of oil, but that correlation is largely "driven by common macroeconomic determinants of the prices of oil and of agricultural commodities.…”
Section: Data: Index Of Real Economic Activity (Rea)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this respect, US biofuel policies constitute new episodes in the saga of distortionary agricultural policies that not only cause world price instability but also harm the welfare of consumers in food-importing developing countries. 26 Developing country policy responses to higher commodity prices in 2008 (caused by US and EU biofuel policies) in the form of export taxes, for example, further exacerbated commodity price volatility (Carter, Rausser, and Smith 2011). Thus, while US agricultural and macroeconomic policies have strongly affected food grain commodity prices and volatility, so have US environmental and energy policies. The roller-coaster ride in market volatility since the financial crisis of 2008, and the re-emergence of peaks in corn, wheat, and soybean prices in 2011, can be traced to all three forms of intervention: US renewable-energy, environmental, and agricultural policies.…”
Section: Evolutionary Assessment Of Biofuel Policies and Grain Price mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When such events combine with macroeconomic fiscal and monetary policies that result in disequilibria between nominal and real rates of interest, the incentives for stockholding change. Moreover, export quotas and other trade restrictions can aggravate (and have aggravated) the volatility of food commodity prices and send the wrong price signals to domestic markets (Carter, Rausser, and Smith 2011). To the extent that such price volatility is not temporary, the cross-commodity linkages through competition for land allocation and demand substitutability often create spill-over effects from one food commodity to another.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%