Commodification of the Egyptian New Capital: A Semio-Foucauldian Landscape Analysis

Abstract

Signs in the urban landscapes are never neutral; they always enact connections to power relations and social hierarchies. By examining the New Administrative Capital of Egypt’s (NAC) advertising billboards, the current study relates itself to the literature of Linguistic Landscape (LL). The study examines the NAC from a semio-discursive perspective. More specifically, it relies on the tools of Semiotic Landscape (SL) to discuss how the landscape of Cairo is represented as a heterogeneous contested space, and how the semiotic resources of its real-estate billboards epitomize Foucauldian principles of heterotopia. The study maintains that the different semiotic resources deployed in the NAC billboards commodify urban space by indexing heterotopic power relations. It is found that spatial commodification of the New Capital is embodied in two heterotopic tropes: “silent” space and “carnival” space. That is, the NAC billboards promote the consumption of the urban space by selling the heterotopic experiences of silence, and carnival-like tempo-spatiality. The study has found that the space of the NAC is semiotically presented in the landscape of Cairo as heterotopic through promoting “different” spatial experiences. To put it differently, the NAC billboards are perceived as antithesis to their landscapes of emplacement, the landscape of Cairo.

Energizing dissensus: Socio-technical (counter) imaginaries along the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor

“…Their claims have ranged from separation from Pakistan to an enhanced political and economic autonomy within the Pakistani state dominated by the Punjabi civil-military establishment. Although the nationalists have never been in political power in Sindh or the center, their mobilization has delivered in terms of job quotas, language and cultural preservation policies from the federal government in Pakistan (Faiz, 2022;Levesque, 2021).…”

“…Central to the ‘discursive planning’ of city spaces, signs are ‘performative devices’ critical for governing multiple urban processes and behaviors. They exhibit power relations, structure social hierarchies, and direct behavior (Fawzy, 2021; Krajina, 2021; Pløger, 2001). The power geometries reflected in public signage connect us to the debates on “socio-technical imaginaries” and Rancièrian “police order”, and to ruptures or counter-imaginaries.…”