1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00993495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commitments and non-commitments: The social radicalism of U.S. Catholic bishops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the Catholic Church also possesses a unique political resource-its strong institutional linkage (Jelen 2003;McMullen 1994;Burns 1992). Specifically the Catholic Church exercises political influence through its institutional connectivity, which helps compensate for its lack of parishioner preference homogeneity on abortion.…”
Section: Discerning Political Influence Among the Faithfulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the Catholic Church also possesses a unique political resource-its strong institutional linkage (Jelen 2003;McMullen 1994;Burns 1992). Specifically the Catholic Church exercises political influence through its institutional connectivity, which helps compensate for its lack of parishioner preference homogeneity on abortion.…”
Section: Discerning Political Influence Among the Faithfulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Politically, the Council was cited as a central factor in the development of Liberation Theology in Latin America (Smith 1991); as an important theological resource for progressive Catholics in the United States (Dillon 1999;Burns 1992); and a reason why the Church began to more actively engage in public debates over war and peace, capitalism, and economic redistribution (Casanova 1994;Burns 1990). A wide variety of sociological studies demonstrated that Vatican II had far-reaching effects on the doctrine, practices, identity, and strength of Roman Catholicism.…”
Section: About V Vatican I Iimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide variety of sociological studies demonstrated that Vatican II had far-reaching effects on the doctrine, practices, identity, and strength of Roman Catholicism. Politically, the Council was cited as a central factor in the development of Liberation Theology in Latin America (Smith 1991); as an important theological resource for progressive Catholics in the United States (Dillon 1999;Burns 1992); and a reason why the Church began to more actively engage in public debates over war and peace, capitalism, and economic redistribution (Casanova 1994;Burns 1990). Practically, the Council liberalized a wide variety of religious practices, such as dietary restrictions and marriage annulment procedures (Wilde 2001), changes that some theorists argue have created a less involved laity (Finke and Stark 1992;Sengers 2003).…”
Section: About V Vatican I Iimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These documents were usually found in a section of each Web site dedicated to child safeguarding. (Burns, 1992;Dillon, 1996;Yamane, 2005). I also paid attention to the presence or absence of mnemonic strategies such as official apologies and church-sanctioned restitution measures (see Table 3).…”
Section: Cases and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%