2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commitment of farmers to environmental protection: From social pressure to environmental conscience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
44
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
44
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the differences we observed were mostly nonsignificant, which may suggest, as already advocated by Michel-Guillou and Moser (2006), that differences in representations of the environment lie in less consensual parts of individual representations. This hypothesis is also consistent with Abric (2011), who states that less consensual elements are more likely to justify contrasted commitment to different behaviors despite common belief about more consensual knowledge.…”
Section: Perception Of Social-ecological Interdependencies Influencinsupporting
confidence: 40%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the differences we observed were mostly nonsignificant, which may suggest, as already advocated by Michel-Guillou and Moser (2006), that differences in representations of the environment lie in less consensual parts of individual representations. This hypothesis is also consistent with Abric (2011), who states that less consensual elements are more likely to justify contrasted commitment to different behaviors despite common belief about more consensual knowledge.…”
Section: Perception Of Social-ecological Interdependencies Influencinsupporting
confidence: 40%
“…A fortiori, despite a substantial literature on relationships between farmers' values, attitudes, and behavior (Ahnström et al 2009), very few studies have addressed the relationship between farmers' mental models and their actual farming practices. Most studies used a priori dichotomous criteria to differentiate practices, e.g., organic vs. conventional farming (Michel-Guillou andMoser 2006, Kelemen et al 2013), or either collective and direct or individual and indirect elicitation methods to assess mental models (Vanwindekens et al 2014, Diniz et al 2015. Because these methods do not rely on direct elicitation of individual mental models and farming practices, they are likely to underestimate the diversity in individual practices and mental models and may therefore produce misleading conclusions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Lian et al (2007) reported that 45% of the Chinese farmers that were interviewed do not recognize environmental impacts of their agriculture practices. In another study, in which farmers were asked to evaluate sources of water pollution, they hold industry and household responsible for water pollution, while minimizing the impacts of their own harmful practices (Michel-Guilloua and Moserb, 2006). This was also the case in our study.…”
Section: Informationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In this regard, Sigwalt et al (2012) describe how some winegrowers planted 23 km of hedgerows to demonstrate to their clients their care for natural enemies and their willingness to decrease their pesticide use. In another context, Michel-Guillou and Moser (2006) demonstrate that farmers mostly adopt proenvironmental practices to comply with social pressure rather than to put their beliefs about the environment into practice. This situation was clearly occurring in our study for the farmers who mentioned this type of resource because their pest management strategy was not https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol22/iss2/art16/ particularly caring for natural enemies.…”
Section: Revealing Marketing and Privatization Processes Around Biolomentioning
confidence: 99%