Commercial nickel-metal hydride (Ni-MH) technology evaluation. Military aircraft battery implications

Erbacher, John K.; Vukson, S.P.

doi:10.1109/bcaa.1997.574069

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Battery Capacity4

A the Effective Energy Per Operation1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Publication Types

Select...

Other4

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent5

Authors

Journals

Cited by 5 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Figure 4 shows the efficiency factor versus discharge current curves extracted from the data sheet of a commercial Lithium battery [17] and the experimental results from [12]. Similar curves exist for other lithium batteries [8][9] [15] and for NiMH batteries [14] [15].…”

Section: Battery Capacity and Efficiencymentioning

confidence: 66%

Design considerations for battery-powered electronics

Pedram

1999

Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Battery Capacity and Efficiencymentioning

confidence: 66%

Design considerations for battery-powered electronics

Pedram

1999

Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The actual capacity of the battery will decrease when the discharge current increases. Figure 5 shows the efficiency factor versus discharge current curve for some commercial Nickel-Metal Hydride batteries [12]. Similar curves exist for lithium batteries [13].…”

Section: Battery Capacitymentioning

confidence: 72%

“…Assuming a circuit with V dd =3.3V and average power dissipation of 33W, we obtain (nC/T)=3. α=0.05 is a reasonable value for the battery (50% efficiency at a 10A discharge current) [12]. Therefore, a reasonable value for β is around 0.04 2 .…”

Section: A the Effective Energy Per Operationmentioning

confidence: 99%