2008
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/3/01/p01002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comments on TPC and RPC calibrations reported by the HARP collaboration

Abstract: The HARP Collaboration recently published calibrations of their TPC and RPC detectors, and differential cross-sections of large-angle pion production in proton-nucleus collisions. We argue that these calibrations are biased and cross-sections based on them should not be trusted.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We hold that the discrepancy is caused by problems in the HARP Collaboration's data analysis, discussed in detail in Refs. [18][19][20][21][22], and summarized in the Appendix of Ref. [2].…”
Section: Comparison With Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hold that the discrepancy is caused by problems in the HARP Collaboration's data analysis, discussed in detail in Refs. [18][19][20][21][22], and summarized in the Appendix of Ref. [2].…”
Section: Comparison With Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These problems, together with others that affect the HARP Collaboration's data analysis, are discussed in detail in Refs. [15][16][17][18][19] and summarized in the Appendix of Ref. [2].…”
Section: Comparison Of Our Results With Results From the Harp Collabomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They result primarily, but not exclusively, from a lack of understanding TPC track distortions and RPC timing signals. These problems, together with others that affect the HARP Collaboration's data analysis, are discussed in great detail in [15][16][17] and summarized in the Appendix of [1].…”
Section: Comparison With Results From the Harp Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%