The subject of hypospadias was reviewed recently in detail by one of my former University of Wisconsin graduate students [Walgenbach, 19791; I offer a brief summary :1. The incidence of hypospadias at birth in the US Midwest may be as high as 1 % (in males).2. Sdrensen [1953], who probably underascertained mild cases in his Danish study, found the four grades of severity (from 1 to 4) in the ratio of 75:12:6:6%; Sweet et a1 [1974], who did not examine their subjects and thus still underascertained the mildest cases, found a ratio of 87:10:3:0%.3. Sweet et a1 [1974] found associated genital defects in 45% of their cases, including a total rate of cryptorchidism of 8 % (vs 1 % in control individuals). Sdrensen [ 19531 established the direct, almost linear, relationship between severity of hypospadias and frequency of cryptorchidism; in first, second, third, and fourth degree cases the excess of cryptorchidism over that expected for age was respectively 2, 6, 12.7, and 16.9 times. 4. No "correlation" has ever been demonstrated between severity of hypospadias and the occurrence of major urinary tract malformations [Lutzker et al, 19771. The incidence of "clinically important abnormality-resulting in significant loss of renal substance or requiring surgical correction for conservation of renal substance" [Donohue et al, 19731 in boys with any degree of hypospadias is twice as high (3.9%) as in nonhypospadias males (less than 2%) and includes obstruction, dilatation, renal dysplasia, hypoplasia, aplasia, and cystic disease. Ureteral ectasia and/or reflux and hydronephrosis, the only conditions that might require surgical intervention, occur in about 3% of patients with hypospadias and usually can be detected by noninvasive methods [Lutzker et al, 19771. Thus, I would continue to recommend renal ultrasonography at least once, and urinalysis for infection several times in all hypospadiac males. Intravenous and/or retrograde pyelography need be done only in case of