2012
DOI: 10.1175/jcli-d-11-00404.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comments on “Reconstruction of the Extratropical NH Mean Temperature over the Last Millennium with a Method That Preserves Low-Frequency Variability”

Abstract: Christiansen and Ljungqvist have presented an extratropical NH temperature reconstruction using a method (LOC) that they claim ''preserves'' low-frequency variability, at the expense of exaggerated highfrequency variability. Using theoretical arguments and a pseudoproxy experiment, it is demonstrated here that the LOC method is not guaranteed to preserve variability at any frequency. Rather, LOC reconstructions will have more variance than true large-scale temperature averages at all frequencies. This variance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in the case of Christiansen and Ljungqvist (2011), reconstructions using the LOC method aim to preserve lowfrequency variability, perhaps to the detriment of high frequencies (Christiansen, 2011). An overestimation of variability can not be ruled out, and some studies suggest these reconstructions may be taken as an estimation of maximum bounds for low-frequency amplitude changes during the last millennium (Tingley and Li, 2012;Moberg, 2012;Christiansen, 2012;Christiansen and Ljungqvist, 2012b). This reconstruction shows noticeably more variance at low frequencies not only in the pre-industrial period but also during the 20th century.…”
Section: Hemispheric and Global Reconstructed Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As in the case of Christiansen and Ljungqvist (2011), reconstructions using the LOC method aim to preserve lowfrequency variability, perhaps to the detriment of high frequencies (Christiansen, 2011). An overestimation of variability can not be ruled out, and some studies suggest these reconstructions may be taken as an estimation of maximum bounds for low-frequency amplitude changes during the last millennium (Tingley and Li, 2012;Moberg, 2012;Christiansen, 2012;Christiansen and Ljungqvist, 2012b). This reconstruction shows noticeably more variance at low frequencies not only in the pre-industrial period but also during the 20th century.…”
Section: Hemispheric and Global Reconstructed Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, pseudo-proxies are generated by degrading the local temperature by adding noise and therefore include assumptions about the temporal structure of the noise (Moberg, 2012;Christiansen and Ljungqvist, 2012). Christiansen and Ljungqvist (2012) discuss how the cutoff between exaggerated high-frequency variability and well reconstructed low-frequency variability depends on the degree of auto-correlation in the noise.…”
Section: Spatial Averagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These new reconstructions have not changed the overall picture, although some show amplitudes of variations larger than those with the largest temperature amplitudes used in AR4. This larger amplitude is mainly a result of a particular choice of calibration technique and it is debated whether the resulting reconstruction has more low-frequency variance than in the real temperature variations (Moberg, 2012;Christiansen and Ljungqvist, 2012b). On the contrary, most previous methods have been shown to potentially result in too little variance (Christiansen et al, 2009).…”
Section: Nh Temperature Reconstructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%