Comments on National guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer 2022 in China (English version)

Zhang, Naiyi; Gao, Yunong

doi:10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2022.05.06

Cited by 6 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In terms of pathological types of cervical cancer, there were also differences among different countries and nationalities, but the differences were not significant [18,19]. Among the subjects of this survey, squamous cell carcinoma accounted for a large proportion (72.6%), which was consistent with the fact that squamous cell carcinoma was also the most common cancer in China [20,21].…”

Section: Implications and Comparison With Literaturessupporting

confidence: 65%

Quality of life and its related-influencing factors in patients with cervical cancer based on the scale QLICP-CE(V2.0)

Chen,

Zhou,

Fong

et al. 2024

BMC Women's Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Quality of life research can guide clinical workers to adopt more targeted treatment and intervention measures, so as to achieve the purpose of improving patients’ quality of life. The objective of this study was to evaluate health-related quality of life in Chinese patients with cervical cancer and to explore its influencing factors. Methods A total of 186 patients with cervical cancer were investigated by using the QLICP-CE (V2.0) scale (Quality of Life Instruments for Cancer Patients-Cervical Cancer) developed by our group in China. The data were analyzed by t-test, one-way ANOVA, univariate analysis, and multivariate linear regression. Results The total score of quality of life scale for cervical cancer patients was (62.58 ± 12.69), Univariate analysis of objective clinical indexes showed that creatinine concentration was a negative influence factor in the psychological domain, potassium ion concentration was a negative influence factor in the common symptoms and side effect domain, erythrocyte content was a positive influence factor physical domain and common general domain. Multiple linear regression results suggested that clinical staging was the influencing factor of common symptom and side effect domain, common general module and total score of scale. Marital status has different degrees of influence on the psychological, social, and common general domains. The level of education also influenced scores in the social domain. Conclusion The total score of quality of life in patients with cervical cancer who received active treatment was acceptable. Marital status, clinical staging, and educational level are the factors that affect the quality of life of patients with cervical cancer. At the same time, potassium ion concentration, red blood cell count and creatinine concentration also have important effects on quality of life in patients with cervical cancer. Therefore, it is very important to give personalized treatment and nursing to patients based on various factors.

show abstract

Section: Implications and Comparison With Literaturessupporting

confidence: 65%

Quality of life and its related-influencing factors in patients with cervical cancer based on the scale QLICP-CE(V2.0)

Chen,

Zhou,

Fong

et al. 2024

BMC Women's Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(2022) also showed that scognitive behavioural therapy improved the quality of sleep in insomnia patients and was more effective than other therapies such as medication and psychotherapy. In addition, national and international guidelines also emphasise the importance of cognitive behavioural therapy in the treatment of sleep disorders (Qaseem et al., 2016; Riemann et al., 2017; Zhang & Zhao, 2013). The possible mechanisms include the following.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…At present, the main treatment for sleep disorders is pharmacological and non‐pharmacological interventions. Although pharmacological treatment has certain curative effects in the short term, studies have found that pharmacological treatment will not only produce addiction (Zhang & Zhao, 2013), but also lead to sleep disorder, cognitive motor dysfunction, memory decline and other adverse outcomes (Yang et al., 2016). These adverse outcomes increase the risk of falls and fractures in older people (Huang et al., 2021).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative efficacy of non‐pharmacological interventions on sleep quality in old adults: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis

Chang,

Chen,

Wang

2024

Journal of Clinical Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims and ObjectivesTo compare the effectiveness of non‐pharmacological interventions in enhancing sleep quality in older people.BackgroundSleep problems in older adults have become increasingly prominent. Sleep problems not only affect the health and quality of life of older people, but also the range of chronic diseases caused by sleep problems also impose a huge burden on social services and health care. Non‐pharmacological interventions are an effective alternative to pharmacological therapies, but it is unclear which non‐pharmacological therapies are most effective in enhancing sleep quality in older adults.DesignA systematic review and network meta‐analysis based on PRISMA‐NMA.MethodsA total of seven databases were searched from the establishment of the database to March 2023. After literature screening and data extraction, the Cochrane Bias assessment tool 2.0 version of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was used to evaluate literature quality. A network meta‐analysis was performed to evaluate the relative efficacy of the non‐pharmacological interventions on sleep quality.ResultsA total of 71 RCTs involving nine non‐pharmacological interventions were included. The results of the network meta‐analysis showed that the joint intervention may be the most effective non‐pharmacological intervention to enhance sleep quality in older adults.ConclusionThis study confirms that non‐pharmacological interventions can improve sleep quality in older adults. The use of non‐pharmacological interventions can be promoted by healthcare professionals in the future to improve the quality of sleep and thus the physical and mental health of older people.Relevance to Clinical PracticeThis evidence suggests that joint interventions may be most effective. Therefore, in the future, a combination of non‐pharmacological interventions could be used to maximise their effectiveness in improving sleep quality in older people and promoting healthy aging.No Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution is not applicable to this study.

show abstract

“…Disagreement will be resolved through discussion with a third reviewer. Results will include all unique outcomes and a frequency table of the most reported outcomes, sorted per outcome domain [22]. This list of unique outcomes will be presented to the expert panel (phase 2).…”

Section: Identification Of Outcomes Through a Scoping Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Developing a Core Outcome Set for Assessing Clinical Safety Outcomes of Prostate Cancer in Clinical Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

Tian,

Zhang,

Ren

et al. 2023

JMIR Res Protoc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Among the common malignant tumors in men worldwide, the incidence of prostate cancer ranks second to lung cancer. This disease will bring an economic burden to patients and their families and can reduce the quality of life of patients. Researchers have conducted numerous clinical trials on the efficacy and safety of different interventions in the treatment of prostate cancer with traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) combined with standard treatment regimens. However, the currently published clinical trials exhibit inconsistent and irregular reporting of outcome measures. Objective The objective of this paper is to emphasize the need for a core outcome set (COS) to facilitate future prostate cancer research, aiming to improve the quality of trials and generate high-quality evidence. Methods This mixed methods project has three phases, as follows: (1) a scoping review of the literature to identify outcomes that have been reported in clinical trials and systematic reviews of interventions involving TCM for the treatment of prostate cancer as well as a qualitative component using interviews to obtain the views of patients with prostate cancer, their families, and their caregivers who have a history of TCM treatment; (2) a Delphi survey among stakeholders to prioritize the core outcomes—Participants will include traditional Chinese and Western medicine clinicians in prostate cancer–related directions, nurses, and methodology experts who will participate in 2 rounds of the Delphi method expert consultation to score each outcome in the list of outcome indicators; and (3) a face-to-face consensus meeting to discuss and agree on the final COS for the application of TCM in the treatment of prostate cancer. Results The protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022356184) before the start of the review process, and we will initiate the review on August 1, 2023; results should be expected by September 1, 2023. The Delphi survey among stakeholders is expected to start in October 2023. Conclusions The development of a core outcome set for assessing clinical safety outcomes of prostate cancer in clinical trials of TCM will provide a significant first step to assist Chinese doctors, researchers, and policy makers. Trial Registration PROSPERO CRD42022356184; https://tinyurl.com/ysakz74r International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/46794

show abstract

Comments on National guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer 2022 in China (English version)

Cited by 6 publications

References 1 publication

Quality of life and its related-influencing factors in patients with cervical cancer based on the scale QLICP-CE(V2.0)

Quality of life and its related-influencing factors in patients with cervical cancer based on the scale QLICP-CE(V2.0)

Comparative efficacy of non‐pharmacological interventions on sleep quality in old adults: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis

Developing a Core Outcome Set for Assessing Clinical Safety Outcomes of Prostate Cancer in Clinical Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About