Comments on "Factors that impact implementing a system development methodology" [with reply]

Yadav, Surya B.; Shaw, Neal G.; Webb, Lisa; Sutcu, C.; Roberts, Tom; Gibson, Matthew; Rainer, R. Kelly; Fields, Kent T.

doi:10.1109/32.910863

Cited by 9 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This is positive both for re-focus and for the advancement of the KM research area, as researchers are encouraged to take advantage of the cumulative body of research in management and IS. Earlier studies have proposed various information systems development methodologies (ISDM), which provide a consistent set of procedures to be followed to make the process of managing and developing information systems more efficient and effective [58]. In addition, ISDM imply a time-dependent sequence of action stages [59].…”

Section: Further Results Of the Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards knowledge needs-technology fit model for knowledge management systems

Baloh¹,

Desouza²

2009

Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology - DESRIST '09

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The goal of this paper is threefold. The first goal is to provide an illustrative example of design science research. Readers will benefit from seeing how design science research guidelines, as proposed by Hevner et al. (2004), can be rigorously followed in a practically relevant study. The second goal is to describe the novel artifact constructed during the research project: a knowledge management system design model. The third goal is to provide a methodological contribution to the design science community. The paper calls for adding an exploratory step in the build phase when designing a new artifact.

show abstract

Section: Further Results Of the Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards knowledge needs-technology fit model for knowledge management systems

Baloh¹,

Desouza²

2009

Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology - DESRIST '09

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This makes effective communication and the sharing of domain knowledge extremely difficult (Yadav and Shaw, 2001). Although there is no consensus about the accepted definitions of these concepts, some authors further compound the problem by using terms without defining them, assuming away the ambiguities that exist.…”

Section: Is Delivery Terminologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The ontology can be traversed and queried in order to understand the relationships between the terms used by practitioners, which will, in effect, improve communication (Yadav and Shaw, 2001). The ontology can be traversed and queried in order to understand the relationships between the terms used by practitioners, which will, in effect, improve communication (Yadav and Shaw, 2001).…”

Section: Step 5: Assessing the Competency Questions And The Ontologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Precision is defined as the ratio of the number of relevant documents retrieved to the total number of documents retrieved, and recall as the ratio of the number of relevant documents retrieved to the total number of existing relevant documents (Liu and Shih, 2004). Debates often rage about the legitimacy of research findings because of divergent interpretations of the constructs and variables analysed (Roberts et al, 1998;Yadav and Shaw, 2001;Roberts et al, 2001). If this problem remains unresolved, it will be compounded as new researchers add to the literature without conforming to the terminology of the domain.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The misapplication of terms presents great difficulty to practitioners who are often confused by the inconsistency and the resulting miscommunication (Yadav and Shaw, 2001). The misapplication of terms presents great difficulty to practitioners who are often confused by the inconsistency and the resulting miscommunication (Yadav and Shaw, 2001).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

An ontology of controversial terms at the core of the systems life cycle

Rao

Mansingh

Duggan

2014

IJMSO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The information system (IS) discipline has been plagued by the absence of agreed definitions of the numerous terminologies that are used throughout the range of processes and activities employed to deliver applications for productive use. This lack of agreement also has constraining implications for cumulative research in the discipline. In this paper, we propose a solution to the problem that involves the development of a formal IS domain ontology using a methodology that focuses on ensuring the completeness and consistency of the ontology. The ontology provides a mechanism for standardising the vocabulary in the domain, classifying concepts and terms, representing relationships, identifying synonyms and homonyms, and it identifies the instances of these concepts and relationships. Our solution will facilitate knowledge sharing in the information systems community and further scholarly activities which require a deeper understanding of the structure of information in this domain.He has published extensively in IS and allied journals, refereed edited books and major conference proceedings, and is co-editor of the book Measuring Information Systems Delivery Quality. He has served as editor and on the editorial board of several international journals. This paper is a revised and expanded version of a paper entitled 'Toward an ontology in the domain of information systems delivery and evolution' presented at the 12th AmericasConference on Information Systems (AMCIS) ', Acapulco, Mexico, 4-6 August 2006.

show abstract

Methodology for the implementation of knowledge management systems

Chalmeta

Grangel

2008

J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Managing knowledge means managing the processes of creation, development, distribution and utilisation of knowledge in order to improve organisational performance and increase competitive capacity.However, serious difficulties arise when attempts are made to implement knowledge management in enterprises. One of the reasons behind this situation is the lack of suitable methodologies for guiding the process of development and implementation of a Knowledge Management System, which is a computer system that allows the processes of creating, collecting, organising, accessing and using knowledge to be automated as far as possible.In this paper we propose a methodology for directing the process of developing and implementing a Knowledge Management System in any type of organisation. The methodology is organised in phases and outlines the activities to be performed, the techniques and supporting tools to be used, and the expected results for each phase. In addition, we show how the proposed methodology can be applied to the particular case of an enterprise.

show abstract

Comments on "Factors that impact implementing a system development methodology" [with reply]

Cited by 9 publications

References 9 publications

Towards knowledge needs-technology fit model for knowledge management systems

Towards knowledge needs-technology fit model for knowledge management systems

An ontology of controversial terms at the core of the systems life cycle

Methodology for the implementation of knowledge management systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About