2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10493-009-9246-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comments on controversial tick (Acari: Ixodida) species names and species described or resurrected from 2003 to 2008

Abstract: There are numerous discrepancies in recent published lists of the ticks of the world. Here we review the controversial names, presenting evidence for or against their validity and excluding some altogether. We also address spelling errors and present a list of 17 species described or resurrected during the years [2003][2004][2005][2006][2007][2008]. We consider the following 35 tick species names to be invalid:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(182 reference statements)
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After examining the syntypes of H. scupense and the holotype of H. detritum, Filippova (2003) concluded that H. detritum should be regarded as a junior subjective synonym of H. scupense and as a junior objective synonym of Hyalomma marginatum Koch, 1844. Guglielmone et al (2009) accepted the latter point of view. The current situation is thus confused both as to the names and their status: traditionally some workers consider both H. scupense and H. detritum as full species, others believe H. scupense to be a subspecies of H. detritum, and a third group accepts H. detritum as a junior synonym of H. scupense.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After examining the syntypes of H. scupense and the holotype of H. detritum, Filippova (2003) concluded that H. detritum should be regarded as a junior subjective synonym of H. scupense and as a junior objective synonym of Hyalomma marginatum Koch, 1844. Guglielmone et al (2009) accepted the latter point of view. The current situation is thus confused both as to the names and their status: traditionally some workers consider both H. scupense and H. detritum as full species, others believe H. scupense to be a subspecies of H. detritum, and a third group accepts H. detritum as a junior synonym of H. scupense.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dichotomous (Table 2) and polytomous keys (Tables 3 & 4) to identify adults and nymphs of Ixodidae to genus were constructed while examining specimens of Amblyomma, Amblyomma (formerly Aponomma), Rhipicephalus (formerly Boophilus), Bothriocroton, Dermacentor, Ixodes, Hyalomma, and Rhipicephalus, and with reference to the following literature : Arthur 1960a, b, Arthur & Chaudhuri 1965, Barker & Murrell 2004, Beati et al 2008, Belozerov et al 2001, Guglielmone et al 2009, Hoogstraal et al 1970, Horak et al 2002, Kaufman 1972, Keirans et al 1994, Klompen et al 2002, Matthysse & Colbo 1987, Nuttall & Warburton 1911, 1915, Roberts 1970, Sonenshine 1991, Varma 1993, Volzit 2002, Volzit & Keirans 2003, Walker et al 2000and Walker et al 2003 To develop the key to New Zealand species, I referred to previously published keys and taxonomic descriptions contained in Arthur (1963), Chilton (1904), Dumbleton (1943Dumbleton ( , 1953Dumbleton ( , 1958Dumbleton ( , 1961Dumbleton ( , 1963Dumbleton ( , 1973, Hoogstraal (1967), Hoogstraal et al (1968), McKenna (1996 and Roberts (1970), and I examined representative male, female and nymphal specimens of all species in New Zealand except I. jacksoni. This allowed a range of discriminating features to be identified and included.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A ninth species named Ixodes serrafreirei Amorim, Gazeta, Bossi and Linhares, 2003 was proposed based on the nymphal stage (AMORIM et al, 2003), but due to lack of proper description I. serrafreirei has been regarded as a nomen nudum (VENZAL et al, 2008;GUGLIELMONE et al, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This communication records the first occurrence of this tick species in the State of Parana, southern region of Brazil, and it constitutes its first report on Akodon montensis (Thomas) Aragão and Fonseca, 1951 (ONOFRIO et al, 2009;DANTAS-TORRES et al, 2009). A ninth species named Ixodes serrafreirei Amorim, Gazeta, Bossi and Linhares, 2003 was proposed based on the nymphal stage (AMORIM et al, 2003), but due to lack of proper description I. serrafreirei has been regarded as a nomen nudum (VENZAL et al, 2008;GUGLIELMONE et al, 2009). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%