2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comments on “Bubble motion in aqueous surfactant solutions”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The governing equations were solved by a finite difference method using an adaptive boundary‐fitted coordinate system. This work was revisited by Liao et al36 who showed that the simulations contained some inaccuracy associated with the numerical algorithm used to solve the surfactant transport equation on the bubble surface. When Liao et al36 corrected the problem, the simulations agreed much better with the experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The governing equations were solved by a finite difference method using an adaptive boundary‐fitted coordinate system. This work was revisited by Liao et al36 who showed that the simulations contained some inaccuracy associated with the numerical algorithm used to solve the surfactant transport equation on the bubble surface. When Liao et al36 corrected the problem, the simulations agreed much better with the experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work was revisited by Liao et al36 who showed that the simulations contained some inaccuracy associated with the numerical algorithm used to solve the surfactant transport equation on the bubble surface. When Liao et al36 corrected the problem, the simulations agreed much better with the experimental data. The effect of surfactants on mass transfer coefficient for bubbles was investigated by Vasconcelos et al,37 Painmanakul et al,38 Sardeing et al,39 Madhavi et al,40 and Maceiras et al41 Dani42 studied the mass transfer between a single bubble and a liquid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,13 ͑2͒ The terminal velocity of bubble is fixed throughout the simulation, which is impossible to experimentally achieve. Only exception is that Liao and McLaughlin 34 allowed the bubble to rise from rest but Liao et al 37 reported significant numerical inaccuracies making their results unreliable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stagnant cap model has been extensively adopted to interpret experimental results and found that this model is consistent with experimental results not only at low to moderate Reynolds numbers but also at large values of the Reynolds numbers. Furthermore, this model is also tested theoretically by many researchers and proved to be reliable under a wide range of Reynolds numbers . As per this model, contaminants can adsorb at the first front half of the bubble surface and move towards the backside of the bubble because of the surface advection caused by the main flow .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%