2014
DOI: 10.1007/jhep01(2014)034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comments on black holes I: the possibility of complementarity

Abstract: Abstract:We comment on a recent paper of Almheiri, Marolf, Polchinski and Sully who argue against black hole complementarity based on the claim that an infalling observer 'burns' as he attempts to cross the horizon. We show that measurements made by an infalling observer outside the horizon are statistically identical for the cases of vacuum at the horizon and radiation emerging from a stretched horizon. This forces us to follow the dynamics all the way to the horizon, where we need to know the details of Plan… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
124
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
5
124
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 We could also do a similar analysis for the finite temperature CFT on S d−1 × time, where we would have to replace the k momenta with discrete spherical harmonic modes.…”
Section: Mode Expansion Of Thermal 2-point Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 We could also do a similar analysis for the finite temperature CFT on S d−1 × time, where we would have to replace the k momenta with discrete spherical harmonic modes.…”
Section: Mode Expansion Of Thermal 2-point Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the principle of equivalence suggests that there is nothing special about the horizon of a large black hole, there have been several speculations that quantum gravity effects cause the interior to be modified into a fuzzball [1][2][3][4][5], and more recently, that the horizon of an "old black hole" is replaced by a firewall [6]. (See also [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24].) These latter proposals originate, not from direct calculations in quantum gravity, but rather in arguments that the information paradox (in various incarnations) cannot be solved without modifying the geometry at, or behind the horizon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a modern interpretation of the information-loss paradox, known as the "firewall" problem [25] (also see [9-11, 26, 27] for earlier versions and [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] for a sample of the related literature). We find the current analysis to be an essential step toward a resolution of this puzzle, but defer this discussion to future publications [46,47].…”
Section: Jhep02(2014)116mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past few years, following its sharpening using quantum information theory [2], it has become increasingly clear that in order to solve this paradox there must be new physics at the black hole horizon. There are many arguments that lead to the same conclusion, some focused on the experience of infalling observers [3][4][5][6] (see also [7]), some based on the AdS-CFT correspondence [8,9], and some based on quantizing fields at the horizon [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%