2017
DOI: 10.1002/bem.22082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comments on analysis of mobile phone use among young patients with brain tumors in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past decade, my colleagues and I have studied the health effects of cellular phones and their base stations. We have also shown that some of the papers claiming no link between mobile phone use and cancer have methodological errors and/or shortcomings (Mortazavi et al, 2017a , b , 2018 ; Mortazavi, 2018 ). For example, in one of the papers reviewed by our research group, a 400% difference in brain tumors was masked by poor statistical analysis!…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the past decade, my colleagues and I have studied the health effects of cellular phones and their base stations. We have also shown that some of the papers claiming no link between mobile phone use and cancer have methodological errors and/or shortcomings (Mortazavi et al, 2017a , b , 2018 ; Mortazavi, 2018 ). For example, in one of the papers reviewed by our research group, a 400% difference in brain tumors was masked by poor statistical analysis!…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…For example, in one of the papers reviewed by our research group, a 400% difference in brain tumors was masked by poor statistical analysis! (Mortazavi, 2018 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,6,[15][16][17][18][19] Regarding cancer, we have recently addressed the limitations and shortcomings of some of the studies claiming lack of association between exposure to radiofrequency radiation and cancer. 2,[20][21][22] Interestingly, in one of the papers reviewed by our research group, a 400% difference in brain tumours was ignored due to poor statistical analysis. 22 We have shown that current controversy, at least to some extent, can be due to the large variations in the magnitude of exposure to electromagnetic fields in different studies.…”
Section: Correspondencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,[20][21][22] Interestingly, in one of the papers reviewed by our research group, a 400% difference in brain tumours was ignored due to poor statistical analysis. 22 We have shown that current controversy, at least to some extent, can be due to the large variations in the magnitude of exposure to electromagnetic fields in different studies. In this light, we showed that in a similar pattern with ionising radiation, the dose-response relationship for carcinogenesis of non-ionising electromagnetic fields is nonlinear and J-shaped.…”
Section: Correspondencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are writing in response to comments by Mortazavi [] on our article, “Analysis of Mobile Phone Use Among Young Patients with Brain Tumors in Japan,” which was published in Bioelectromagnetics [Sato et al, ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%