Commentary: When Promising Innovators Lack Strategic Vision: The Concept of Flow Modulation in Aortic Dissection

Sultan, Sherif; Acharya, Yogesh; Hynes, Niamh

doi:10.1177/1526602820954450

Cited by 2 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…But as we can observe in many companies not always the effectiveness on tactical level is connected with effectiveness on strategic level of company (Miyake, 2022;Sultan et al, 2021). Sometimes the company can implement new technological solution but it's effectiveness will not increase in long term due to lack of strategical view, strategical thinking and strategical approach.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2023

SPSUTOM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this article is to identify attributes related to the quality of the hospitalization process, categorized from absolutely necessary to those whose presence does not significantly impact this quality (according to the Kano methodology). The identified attributes also simultaneously contribute to shaping patient satisfaction. The primary objective of this article is to indicate at what level in the satisfaction assessment factors determine the quality of the hospitalization process and to what extent they align with the expectations of hospitalized patients. Design/methodology/approach: The literature review will focus on identifying factors determining the quality of the hospitalization process. The empirical part of the article will revolve around classifying these attributes according to the Kano methodology through survey research. The next stage of the research process will involve assessing the satisfaction of hospitalized patients in areas corresponding to the Kano attributes -through survey researchand identifying discrepancies between expectations and satisfaction levels. Findings: Among the attributes that particularly determine the attractiveness of a hospital unit are those related to reducing time. Shortening the admission time to the ward, waiting for discharge, and the time it takes to conduct prescribed tests are emphasized. Additionally, the importance of adhering to the treatment stages according to the planned schedule is highlighted. Therefore, it is recommended as a priority to simplify procedures for both admission to the ward and discharge, as well as to strictly adhere to the treatment schedule while optimizing it to reduce the waiting time for prescribed tests during hospitalization.Research limitations/implications: The article presents the results of literature research, which can be complemented in further studies on this topic. One limitation of the research is the relatively narrow group of patients who completed the satisfaction assessment survey, both in terms of the number of patients, geographical area, and the number of hospital facilities. Additionally, the study only presented attributes related to the organization and the quality of the hospitalization process, without delving into broader topics related to personnel or material conditions, which likely also influence the level of patient satisfaction. These limitations point towards directions for future research. Practical implications: The results of the conducted research can have practical applications in the business field. Satisfaction assessment surveys completed by hospitalized patients from various hospitals will identify areas where patient satisfaction is the lowest. Consequently, 10 N. Baskiewicz, M. Daroń, A. Pachura, A. Sanojca they can serve as a basis for developing guidelines for efforts aimed at improving the quality of the hospitalization process. Additionally, the Kano methodology will indicate which attributes that determine the quality of the hospitalization process are most significant to pati...

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2023

SPSUTOM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The more extensive the network of scientific exploration that we are involved in, the better our expertise and knowledge. 2,5 The medical device industry-known for producing lifesaving innovations and creating millions of jobs across the world-stands at the forefront of the innovation. It seeks to hire eager, creative people to bring freshness on board; however, more often than not, these bright, imaginative individuals do not realize their potential and are left disappointed.…”

Section: Challengesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The more extensive the network of scientific exploration that we are involved in, the better our expertise and knowledge. 2,5…”

Section: Challengesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…On one end of the spectrum are the "innovators and early adopters" (interventional cardiologists, endovascular key opinion leaders, and neuroradiologists), who are enthusiastic about adopting new ideas (Figure 1). [1][2][3] The most prominent example is the late professor Edward B. Diethrich, who was one of the early vascular surgeons to introduce and adapt endovascular grafts in the history of vascular surgery. Then the "early majority" (vascular and endovascular specialists), mostly from the United States, continental Europe, Ireland, and New Zealand, who are keen to use something new but only after they feel it is safe to do so.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Why Are Medical Device Multinationals Choking Disruptive Technology and Killing Innovation? Challenges to Innovation in Medical Device Technology

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Medical device innovation has maintained momentum, irrespective of changing socioeconomic trends, as medical device companies recognize the need to innovate. However, the translation of device innovation into clinical practice continues to be a daunting, and often a complex and protracted process.The clinical community is diverse. On one end of the spectrum are the "innovators and early adopters" (interventional cardiologists, endovascular key opinion leaders, and neuroradiologists), who are enthusiastic about adopting new ideas (Figure 1). [1][2][3] The most prominent example is the late professor Edward B. Diethrich, who was one of the early vascular surgeons to introduce and adapt endovascular grafts in the history of vascular surgery. Then the "early majority" (vascular and endovascular specialists), mostly from the United States, continental Europe, Ireland, and New Zealand, who are keen to use something new but only after they feel it is safe to do so. Then, the "late majority," mostly from the United Kingdom, Japan, Australia, Brazil, and Argentina, who follow everyone else's lead. Finally, the other end of the spectrum constitutes the rest-the laggards, who will never accept any solution, no matter how many others use it or how promising it has been. Although there is a natural tendency to lag and avoid the burden of rapid development, there is no excuse for not being open to the adoption of newer technologies as we move forward.The three individual innate traits that mandate our future goals and act as our natural differentiators are expertise, creative thinking, and intrinsic motivation (Figure 2). 4 Innovators tend to have outstanding educational credentials and often a state-of-the-art facility, but without motivation, there is no hope for accomplishment. Therefore, we believe that "excellence is not competitive."Our autonomy and freedom fosters creativity and heightens our intrinsic motivation and sense of ownership. Freedom allows us to approach problems through our expertise and creative thinking. Intrinsic motivation and interest in solving a problem are key driving factors, which are independent of material gain. The intrinsic motivation of relishing a challenge, and our drive to crack a challenging situation that no 989356J ETXXX10.

show abstract

Commentary: When Promising Innovators Lack Strategic Vision: The Concept of Flow Modulation in Aortic Dissection

Cited by 2 publications

References 32 publications

Untitled

Untitled

Why Are Medical Device Multinationals Choking Disruptive Technology and Killing Innovation? Challenges to Innovation in Medical Device Technology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About