Commentary: Three Perspectives on Science Exhibits in the Museum of Science and Industry, Franklin Institute, and National Zoo

Abstract

In separate but related comments, each coauthor describes how controversial content is handled within a specific science exhibit or exhibits at the Museum of Science and Industry (Chicago, Illinois), the Franklin Institute (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania), and the Smithsonian Institution's National Zoological Park (Washington, D.C.). Together, the authors demonstrate how context, design, sponsorship, and politics increasingly influence science museum content and visitors' experiences.

Communication about science in a traditional museum: visitors’ and staff’s perceptions

“…For example, Baldock (1995) described the planning of a new gallery at the Birmingham Museum of Science and Industry to focus on the nature of science, rather than the products that have long been the mainstay of science and technology museums. Fitzgerald, Yezril, and Dial (1997) analysed exhibits that try to communicate the science in controversial issues and how those issues are shaped by social and political forces. Bradbourne (2001) described how he has developed a range of science exhibitions aimed at turning museum visitors into museums users by involving them in sustained interaction.…”