“…Although the ‘politically conservative [Orr] argued for cheap food policies that would both relieve the economic problems of agriculture and alleviate the nutritional problems of the poor’ (Smith, : 502), his belief ‘that the international priority for health in the post‐war period should be universal access to staple foods priced within the reach of all people’ (Ruxin, : 49) was too radical for those to whom food was a commodity that could be used for political leverage. After Orr resigned ‘with a feeling of grave disappointment over the rejection of his idea for a World Food Board’ (Phillips, : 36), and the leadership of the FAO ‘passed to those less nutritionally‐inclined and less idealistically inspired’ (Ruxin, : 58), nutrition moved from the domain of public health and social medicine to the world of agriculture and commerce, confirming the enduring marriage between capital and science that had been visualized during the inter‐war years.…”