2009
DOI: 10.5408/1.3544261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commentary: On Teaching the Nature of Science and the Science-Religion Interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dialogue view allows conflict between science and religion to be shaped so that both religious and scientific perspectives can be critically put into question and, eventually, changed (Bickmore, Thompson, Grandy, & Tomlin, 2009;Reiss, 2014). Taking the example of a Christian, it is about "making his theology and his cosmology consonant in the contributions they make to this world-view.…”
Section: The Relationship Between Science and Religionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dialogue view allows conflict between science and religion to be shaped so that both religious and scientific perspectives can be critically put into question and, eventually, changed (Bickmore, Thompson, Grandy, & Tomlin, 2009;Reiss, 2014). Taking the example of a Christian, it is about "making his theology and his cosmology consonant in the contributions they make to this world-view.…”
Section: The Relationship Between Science and Religionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antolin and Herbers stated that one of the factors related to students' understanding of the concept of evolution is that most students have a religious tendency towards scientific theories (Bickmore et al, 2009), and nevertheless reasoning about biological evolution is based on intuitive thinking or scientific reasoning (Cheryl-To, Tenenbaum, & Hogh, 2017). Shtulman and Schulz; Coley and Tanner, add that the available evidence suggests that the challenges in understanding evolution are rooted in deeply held intuitive thinking rather than the complexity of the concept of biology itself (Richard, Coley, & Tanner, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%