2006
DOI: 10.1177/1463499606061732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commentary on Searle's ‘Social ontology: Some basic principles’

Abstract: In response to Searle's article on social ontology, this commentary focuses on the relation between the concept of culture and Searle's work on institutions. Issues concerning the super-organic property of culture and collectivities, the fusion between ideas and social agreement found in institutions, and the relation of values to institutions are discussed. The constructs culture, society, and personality are deconstructed, revealing the high degree of overlap in the referents of these terms. Finally, a defin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To function effectively within KOG, members need to know—and indeed psychologically “internalize” or commit to (D’Andrade and Strauss, 1992)—this guild’s particular cultural “model” or understanding of “doing good.” These distinctive normative goals—socially learned and thus transmitted in the act of play itself and thus “cultural” in the cognitive anthropological sense of this term (D’Andrade, 1995)—importantly shape whether KOG online game-play is experienced alternately as psychosocially beneficial or harmful. That is, Lainey and Vern’s personal norms have become culturally institutionalized in thought and practice, now broadly shared in KOG as a whole rather than only evident in these two’s individual behaviors (D’Andrade, 2006).…”
Section: Discussion Of Results In Relationship To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To function effectively within KOG, members need to know—and indeed psychologically “internalize” or commit to (D’Andrade and Strauss, 1992)—this guild’s particular cultural “model” or understanding of “doing good.” These distinctive normative goals—socially learned and thus transmitted in the act of play itself and thus “cultural” in the cognitive anthropological sense of this term (D’Andrade, 1995)—importantly shape whether KOG online game-play is experienced alternately as psychosocially beneficial or harmful. That is, Lainey and Vern’s personal norms have become culturally institutionalized in thought and practice, now broadly shared in KOG as a whole rather than only evident in these two’s individual behaviors (D’Andrade, 2006).…”
Section: Discussion Of Results In Relationship To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…is worth noting that they are far from resolved, and there is much scholarship discussing these issues (D'Andrade 2006;Sponsel 2007;Snodgrass & Tiedje 2008). Some authors assert that a lack of religious tradition among leading American scientists has led to a lack of ongoing interaction between these scientists and religious individuals and communities, and a lack of cultural context for understanding the differences in their worldview, a gap that hampers dialogue (Ecklund 2012).…”
Section: Why Conservation Needs Religion 243mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Ethnography is a case study account of the cultural knowledge and behavior characteristic of a particular group or setting [1,38,39]. The "culture" piece relates to the fact that humans as a social species have the evolved ability to think and behave jointly or collectively [40][41][42]. That is, humans transmit information to each other, which becomes the basis of collective attention, intention, and action [43][44][45].…”
Section: The Abductive Logic Of Ethnographic Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%