Commentary on “Meta-analysis of Prospective Randomized Studies Comparing Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) and Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (CMLC)” by Pisanu A, Reccia I, Porceddu G, et al. (J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16:1790–1801)

Christensen, Anders Mark

doi:10.1007/s11605-013-2245-y

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

History Of a Development1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2018

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…With a focus on the small sample size one has to question the value of missing significances in the differences even in meta analyses [14]. It remains the danger of underestimating the risks [15][16][17].…”

Section: History Of a Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Single Port Laparoscopic Surgery- Are there Limitations of Minimal Invasive Surgery? Definition of an Opinion

Kapischke¹,

Pries²

2018

BJSTR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The conventional laparoscopic surgery has significantly reduced the operative access trauma; given it is in the interest of the patient it is reasonable to continue working on further reduction. However, there remains the question if the necessary effort and the danger if the measured improved parameters are pure surrogate parameters without any clinical relevance. Relevant factors are i.surgical quality equivalence to the standard procedure,

show abstract