2005
DOI: 10.1177/00222194050380041001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commentary on Early Identification and Intervention for Students With Mathematics Difficulties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…So far studies on how finger counting habits interact with mathematics performance have mostly focused on children and adults without diagnosed disabilities. As we discussed earlier, children with mathematics learning difficulties have a harder time transitioning from finger counting to verbal counting and retrieval strategies (Bryant, 2005;Geary, 2004;Jordan & Hanich, 2000;Jordan et al, 2008) For example, patients diagnosed with autism (Gunter, Ghaziuddin, & Ellis, 2002), ADHD (Roessner, Banaschewski, Uebel, Becker, & Rothenberger, 2004), dyslexia (von Plessen et al, 2002), and developmental language disorder (Herbert et al, 2004) were found to have abnormalities in the size and function of their corpus callosum (the sets of nerve fibers connecting the left and right hemispheres; see van der Knaap & van der Ham, 2011 for a review) and lateralization patterns. It is possible that the abnormalities with corpus callosum, which affect interhemispheric communication, lead to differences in finger counting habits as well.…”
Section: What Can Finger Counting Habits Tell Us?mentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So far studies on how finger counting habits interact with mathematics performance have mostly focused on children and adults without diagnosed disabilities. As we discussed earlier, children with mathematics learning difficulties have a harder time transitioning from finger counting to verbal counting and retrieval strategies (Bryant, 2005;Geary, 2004;Jordan & Hanich, 2000;Jordan et al, 2008) For example, patients diagnosed with autism (Gunter, Ghaziuddin, & Ellis, 2002), ADHD (Roessner, Banaschewski, Uebel, Becker, & Rothenberger, 2004), dyslexia (von Plessen et al, 2002), and developmental language disorder (Herbert et al, 2004) were found to have abnormalities in the size and function of their corpus callosum (the sets of nerve fibers connecting the left and right hemispheres; see van der Knaap & van der Ham, 2011 for a review) and lateralization patterns. It is possible that the abnormalities with corpus callosum, which affect interhemispheric communication, lead to differences in finger counting habits as well.…”
Section: What Can Finger Counting Habits Tell Us?mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…First, second, and third grade children with mathematics difficulties are more reliant on finger counting strategies, and they have a harder time transitioning from finger counting to verbal counting and retrieval strategies, which typically occurs towards the end of first grade and early second grade with children who are not identified with any impairments (Bryant, 2005;Geary, 2004;Jordan & Hanich, 2000;Jordan et al, 2008). In addition, mathematics learning disability seems to interact with reading disability; children with both types of disabilities (comorbid) show further problems in memorizing and retrieving arithmetic facts than children with only mathematics learning disability.…”
Section: Finger Counting and Mathematics Learning Difficultiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A principal area of consideration with respect to learning disabilities and mathematics is the divide between procedural and conceptual instructional practice and whether explicit inquiry-based instruction can and should be integrated for students with learning disabilities (Pedrotty-Bryant, 2005). Students with learning disabilities often have difficulty retaining facts (Geary, 1993), and so the instructional approach for these students tends toward memorization through repetition rather than the development of conceptual knowledge (Cawley & Parmar, 1992).…”
Section: Learning Disabilities and Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, the cognitive approach does not propose teaching methods but only assesses the cognitive functions that participate in or form the foundation of mathematics acquisition, such as attention, working memory, visual-spatial memory and executive functions (Bryant, 2005; Locuniak & Jordan, 2008; Mammarella et al, 2010; Schuchardt & Maehler, 2010). These functions are considered simultaneously predictors of the positive or negative acquisition of mathematics in primary school (Bull et al, 2008; LeFevre et al, 2010; Passolunghi et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%