2021
DOI: 10.1111/add.15692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commentary on Di Castelnuovo et al: Implications of using low volume drinkers instead of never drinkers as the reference group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(7 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We agree with Naimi et al . [1] on the need for very careful measurement of volume and pattern of alcohol consumption and believe that we were correct in this, but we disagree with their suggestion that in observational studies non‐drinkers should not be compared with low‐volume drinkers, given that these comparisons have public health importance, and data from clinical trials are presently lacking.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We agree with Naimi et al . [1] on the need for very careful measurement of volume and pattern of alcohol consumption and believe that we were correct in this, but we disagree with their suggestion that in observational studies non‐drinkers should not be compared with low‐volume drinkers, given that these comparisons have public health importance, and data from clinical trials are presently lacking.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 79%
“…Naimi et al . [1] claim that we should have used low volume drinkers as the reference group (instead of no drinkers). Following their suggestion, we provide here in Figure 1 the dose–response relationship between level of alcohol intake and total mortality, using 5 g/day intake of alcohol as the reference value (the data set is the same as in Di Castelnuovo et al .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To compare directly associations with brain iron between alcohol intakes, weekly consumption was categorized into quintiles (and octiles for a sensitivity analysis). The lowest quintile of drinkers was used as the reference category to avoid under-estimating alcohol-related risks [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%