2004
DOI: 10.1080/1464935042000204240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commentary: indigenous planning and the burden of colonialism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Her shack on the Elliott Bay tideflats was not far from the central waterfront site, where the most important Duwamish settlement on the bay was located and where some of the nearly 100 native longhouses burned by settlers were located [97]. Such histories indicate the tribal interests that might support understanding the urban blue space as a "contact zone" between indigenous claims and state-based planning [91]; a venue of deliberate, contested unsettling of planning and development practices through an emergent politics of difference [98,99].…”
Section: Tribal Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Her shack on the Elliott Bay tideflats was not far from the central waterfront site, where the most important Duwamish settlement on the bay was located and where some of the nearly 100 native longhouses burned by settlers were located [97]. Such histories indicate the tribal interests that might support understanding the urban blue space as a "contact zone" between indigenous claims and state-based planning [91]; a venue of deliberate, contested unsettling of planning and development practices through an emergent politics of difference [98,99].…”
Section: Tribal Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dispossession and exclusion of the local people are the sociospatial consequences of this brand of colonialism as “settlers usually occupied space at the expense of existing inhabitants, who were referred to as ‘native’ and regarded as ‘primitive’” (Sandercock 2004, 118). Such strategies are part of the project of colonization, defined as “a political and economic phenomenon, characterized by the forcible domination and exploitation of a state over territory and population beyond its own borders,” but not requiring direct political sponsorship from an outside government or country (Aaronsohn 1996, 217).…”
Section: Settlersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of prioritizing Indigenous values, the nominal recognition and control that accompanied the 1996 On-Reserve Housing Policy had the effect of subjugating and compartmentalizing Indigenous interests (King, 2010;Rankin, 2010;Sandercock, 2004), acting as a form of "internal colonization" (Hibbard & Lane, 2004, p. 98). Shifting from the more overt colonial tactic of civilizing through forcible changes, participation in the planning processes is "couched in the vernacular of mutual recognition" (Coulthard, 2007, p. 438).…”
Section: Indigenous Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%