The ideal aortic valve surgery in children must result in an unobstructed, competent aortic valve that is also durable and accommodates growth of the child. Intuitively, aortic valve surgery in children must emulate native aortic valve anatomy and physiology as close as possible, preferably using autologous tissues with growth potential. The optimal approach to aortic valve surgery in children is yet to be defined. The purpose of this focused review is to highlight recent key publications on the topic.
AORTIC VALVE REPAIRAortic valve repair is currently performed in children with increasingly good results. 1 Last year, outstanding results of aortic valve repair in neonates were reported by Vergnat and colleagues 2 in neonates with congenital aortic stenosis treated between 1989 and 2015. Of these patients, 52 underwent surgical aortic valve repair and 51 underwent balloon aortic dilatation. There was similar early mortality (7.8% for ballooning vs 3.9% for repair) and 10-year survival (88% for ballooning vs 94% for surgery, P ¼ .25). However, freedom from reoperation was superior in the group undergoing aortic valve repair (66% vs 36%, P < .01). Similar results have been reported by Siddiqui and colleagues 3 for neonates and infants. Thus, it appears that the outcomes of aortic valve repair in neonates and infants are superior to those achieved by balloon dilation.In children aged more than 1 year, the operative mortality for aortic valve repair is 0.4% to 1.8% and freedom from reoperation is approximately 70% at 10 years. 4 d'Udekem and colleagues 5 reported 142 children who underwent aortic valve repairs between 1996 and 2009 at a median age of 9 years. Early mortality was 1.8% in children aged more than 1 year. Freedom from reoperation was 80% at 7 years follow-up. The use of cusp extension was associated with increased risk of reoperation.