2017
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commentary: Computerised interpretation of fetal heart rate during labour (INFANT): a randomised controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, CTG is bound by a lower temporal precision in identifying beat-to-beat information (fetal heartbeat information derived with ultrasound or fetal scalp electrode by standard monitors at a uniform frequency of ~4Hz). True beat-to-beat data is needed for some of the derivative estimates of the FHR variability with a potential to improve the prediction of neonatal outcomes 53 . Its utility remains to be investigated in the future with the advance of transabdominal technologies and appropriate data collection.…”
Section: Trans-abdominal Fetal Electrocardiogram Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, CTG is bound by a lower temporal precision in identifying beat-to-beat information (fetal heartbeat information derived with ultrasound or fetal scalp electrode by standard monitors at a uniform frequency of ~4Hz). True beat-to-beat data is needed for some of the derivative estimates of the FHR variability with a potential to improve the prediction of neonatal outcomes 53 . Its utility remains to be investigated in the future with the advance of transabdominal technologies and appropriate data collection.…”
Section: Trans-abdominal Fetal Electrocardiogram Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, for HRV monitoring to deliver on this promise, non‐invasive acquisition of the fetal ECG from the maternal abdomen is needed at the sampling rate of 1000 Hz (Frasch et al . ). This forms the basis for a precise reconstruction of fetal heart rate time series from the R–R interval length fluctuations and to compute HRV measures such as RMSSD, SDNN or skewness deployed in the study by Yamaguchi et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In fact, the role of fHR monitoring (electronic fetal monitoring, EFM, to be precise), despite being used in over 90% of hospitals during delivery, remains controversial (Schifrin, 2020 ). There is no clarity on its usefulness in decreasing perinatal mortality or cerebral palsy when measured by a CTG which has been explained by the incorrect focus of EFM on prediction of acidemia, a poor correlate to fetal injury, instead of predicting fetal cardiovascular decompensation per se as well as the limitations of CTG technologies in capturing the short-term time scale fluctuations of HRV reflecting vagal modulations (Alfirevic et al, 2017 ; Frasch et al, 2017 ; Frasch, 2018 ; Gold and Frasch, 2021 ). Consequently, EFM fails to identify fetuses at risk of brain injury; this is because there is no clear correlation between fetal brain injury and acidemia (Westerhuis et al, 2007 ; Cahill et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: The Environmental Factors Affecting the Ans Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%