Background: Initial clinical evaluation (ICE) is traditionally considered a useful screening tool to identify frail patients during the preoperative assessment.However, emerging evidence supports the more objective assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) via cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to improve surgical risk stratification. Herein, we compared both subjective and objective assessment approaches to highlight the interpretive idiosyncrasies.Methods: As part of routine preoperative patient contact, patients scheduled for major surgery were prospectively "eyeballed" (ICE) by two experienced clinicians before more detailed history taking that also included the American Society of Anesthesiologists score classification. Each patient was subjectively judged to be either "frail" or "not frail" by ICE and "fit" or "unfit" from a thorough review of the medical notes. Subjective data were compared against the more objective validated assessment of postoperative outcomes using established CPET "cut-off" metrics incorporating peak pulmonary oxygen uptake, V ̇O2PEAK at the anaerobic threshold (V ̇O2 -AT), and ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide that collectively informed risk stratification. These data were retrospectively extracted from a single-center prospective National Health Service database. Data were analyzed using the Chisquare automatic interaction detection decision tree method.Results: A total of 127 patients were examined that comprised 58% male and 42% female patients aged 69 ± 10 years with a body mass index of 29 ± 7 kg/m 2 . Patients were poorly conditioned with a V ̇O2PEAK almost 20% lower than predicted for age,