2020
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commentary: A mental number line in human newborns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, it is known that arbitrary bindings that would be required for the OPE are enabled only from the beginning of the third year of life in these external spatial systems 29 . Overall, rather than relating to the flexible use of spontaneous spatial coding for serial order ability in WM, we believe that the above findings with 7‐month‐old infants are a reflection of left‐to‐right biases that are evoked by biological factors, such as brain lateralization in the control of spatial attention 30,31 . Whereas the left‐to‐right oriented spatial coding of serial order observed in some children of the current study could potentially be explained by the lateralization in the brain's attentional systems, the latter could not explain the right‐to‐left oriented coding observed here in a different subset of children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Importantly, it is known that arbitrary bindings that would be required for the OPE are enabled only from the beginning of the third year of life in these external spatial systems 29 . Overall, rather than relating to the flexible use of spontaneous spatial coding for serial order ability in WM, we believe that the above findings with 7‐month‐old infants are a reflection of left‐to‐right biases that are evoked by biological factors, such as brain lateralization in the control of spatial attention 30,31 . Whereas the left‐to‐right oriented spatial coding of serial order observed in some children of the current study could potentially be explained by the lateralization in the brain's attentional systems, the latter could not explain the right‐to‐left oriented coding observed here in a different subset of children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Specifically, we may have tapped into a pre-conceptual mapping between magnitudes and space that also exists in human newborns (de Hevia et al, 2017 ; Di Giorgio, Di Giorgio et al, 2019 ) and some animals (Rugani et al, 2015 ). We believe that this evolutionarily inherited association reflects neuronal tuning of the brain hemispheres (Felisatti, Laubrock, Shaki, & Fischer 2020a , b ) that is subsequently modulated by culturally acquired directional habits, such as reading or finger counting (Shaki & Fischer, 2018b ). An interesting observation is that right-to-left counters seem to have weaker SNAs—a finding reminiscent of the modulatory effect of finger counting on SNARC in adults (Fischer, 2008 ) and awaiting further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This spatial–numerical association (SNA) has been extensively documented in speeded number classification tasks with lateralized button responses, now widely known as SNARC effect (for spatial – numerical association of respon se codes ; Dehaene, Bossini, & Giraux, 1993 ; for reviews, see Fischer & Shaki, 2014 ; Knops, 2020 ): Responses are faster and more accurate for small numbers with left-side responses and for larger numbers with right-side responses. Recently, SNAs were also documented in newborn humans (de Hevia, Veggiotti, Streri, & Bonn, 2017 ; Di Giorgio, Lunghi, Rugani, Regolin, Dalla Barba, Vallortigara, & Simion, 2019 ) and chicks (Rugani, Vallortigara, Priftis, & Regolin, 2015 ) with the use of non-symbolic visual quantities, pointing to a fundamental and pre-conceptual link (Felisatti, Laubrock, Shaki, & Fischer, 2020a , 2020b ). Whether such behavioral effects on speed and accuracy also lead to biased quantity appreciations is unknown and requires contrasts against veridical performance, as we will show below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, all biological explanations of SNAs ground on the association of numerosity with space. Here, we present a novel proposal that focuses on the association between nonnumerical visual‐spatial frequency (SF) and space 32 . As we will later show, the spatial frequency features contained in any visual stimulus, including sets of dots, can serve as non‐numerical foundation for nonsymbolic SNAs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%