2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b07750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on “The Role of Concentration Dependent Static Permittivity of Electrolyte Solutions in the Debye–Hückel Theory”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(62 reference statements)
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 for La 3+ and Cl − , respectively, in LaCl 3 . This figure explains why the qualitative agreement for La 3+ is so valuable (the corresponding figure for Ca 2+ can be found in our previous papers [24,25]). The II term goes down to −20kT and the IW term goes up to 20kT at concentrations close to saturation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…4 for La 3+ and Cl − , respectively, in LaCl 3 . This figure explains why the qualitative agreement for La 3+ is so valuable (the corresponding figure for Ca 2+ can be found in our previous papers [24,25]). The II term goes down to −20kT and the IW term goes up to 20kT at concentrations close to saturation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…In the GlyR-Apo, the pore is relatively narrow and constricted prominently at Leu9′ (pore radius ~ 1.4 Å) and Thr13′ (pore radius ~ 2.2 Å). The pore dimensions at positions Ala20′ and Pro-2′ are also below the Born radius for the solvated chloride ion which is 2.26 Å (the Pauling radius for chloride ion is 1.81 Å) 28 and are therefore likely barriers to ion permeation ( Fig 1B). The M2 helices show partial unwinding between Gly17′ and Ala20′, a feature that is consistent with the dynamic behavior of this region previously noted in NMR studies of the isolated GlyR TMD 29 .…”
Section: The Permeation Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has becoming accepted that a Born‐type equation 39 shall be included in order to describe the ion‐solvent interactions when modeling an electrolyte solution, with either the Debye–Hückel or the mean spherical approximation theory 22,23,29,37,40‐48 . It has been shown 22,35 that a full version of the Debye–Hückel theory naturally contains a contribution for the ion‐solvent interactions, which is essentially equivalent to the Born equation used in most of the aforementioned references 45 . In this section, however, in order to distinguish these two different contributions, the Debye–Hückel theory is still used to only represent the ion‐ion interactions, while the Born equation is used for the ion‐solvent interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was “discovered” by Zarubin and Pavlov 25 why the theory is blind to the size dissimilarity, but it needs to be pointed out that this discovery was only based on the extended Debye–Hückel law, which did not take the ion‐solvent interactions into account. There are discussions which size parameter shall be used in the Debye–Hückel theory and the Born equation 37,45,49,50 . The same parameter was used in both contributions in some studies, 22,35 and different size parameters were used in some other cases 29,45,51 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%