The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1002/2014tc003772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on “Stress and fault parameters affecting fault slip magnitude and activation time during a glacial cycle” by Steffen et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hampel et al . [, hereinafter Ha15] recently commented on our study [ Steffen et al , ], which investigates the effect of stress and fault parameters on fault slip magnitude and activation time during a glacial cycle using a newly developed two‐dimensional glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA)‐fault model [ Steffen et al , ]. In summary, Ha15 criticize the following parts of our study stating “ (1) that Steffen et al [] describe our modeling approach in a misleading way, (2) that they do not mention the specific results (e.g., regarding the amount and timing of fault slip) of our studies anywhere in their article despite the similarity of the topic of their article, and (3) that the content and layout of Steffen et al's Figure 1 closely resembles two figures previously published in our studies but they do not cite the source (they, however, introduced conceptual errors concerning the glacial‐interglacial stress evolution into their figure) .”…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hampel et al . [, hereinafter Ha15] recently commented on our study [ Steffen et al , ], which investigates the effect of stress and fault parameters on fault slip magnitude and activation time during a glacial cycle using a newly developed two‐dimensional glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA)‐fault model [ Steffen et al , ]. In summary, Ha15 criticize the following parts of our study stating “ (1) that Steffen et al [] describe our modeling approach in a misleading way, (2) that they do not mention the specific results (e.g., regarding the amount and timing of fault slip) of our studies anywhere in their article despite the similarity of the topic of their article, and (3) that the content and layout of Steffen et al's Figure 1 closely resembles two figures previously published in our studies but they do not cite the source (they, however, introduced conceptual errors concerning the glacial‐interglacial stress evolution into their figure) .”…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%