2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.112.129301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on “State-Dependent Electron Delocalization Dynamics at the Solute-Solvent Interface: Soft-X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy and Ab initio Calculations”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of delocalization and electron transfer processes in TFY and PFY detected x-ray absorption has recently been under debate [10][11][12][13][14][15] proving that speculations [16] severely overestimated charge delocalization based on the assignment of spectral features derived from x-ray optics [11,17] to charge transfer processes instead. Work on a selected model system with comprehensive experimental x-ray spectroscopic measurements, ab initio restricted active space self consisted field (RAS-SCF) for core-excited states in direct comparison to semi-empirical crystal field multiplet (CFM) has identified the statedependent fluorescence yield from the atomic dipole transition matrix elements as the crucial parameter to describe TFY and PFY in a rather localized atomic picture [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of delocalization and electron transfer processes in TFY and PFY detected x-ray absorption has recently been under debate [10][11][12][13][14][15] proving that speculations [16] severely overestimated charge delocalization based on the assignment of spectral features derived from x-ray optics [11,17] to charge transfer processes instead. Work on a selected model system with comprehensive experimental x-ray spectroscopic measurements, ab initio restricted active space self consisted field (RAS-SCF) for core-excited states in direct comparison to semi-empirical crystal field multiplet (CFM) has identified the statedependent fluorescence yield from the atomic dipole transition matrix elements as the crucial parameter to describe TFY and PFY in a rather localized atomic picture [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the more bulk sensitive fluorescence yield mode is not a viable alternative either, as it does not strictly represent absorption. 49,50 The best option whether RXR is not available is to terminate the sample with a protective layer. However, in many cases it will be difficult to find a material that does not itself change the film properties: it has to be lattice matched, of the same polarity, of comparable oxygen affinity and so on.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47 Minor differences between the powder and aqueous spectra in our measurements could be attributed to state-dependent decay effects, which cause fluorescence yield measurements to deviate from absorption cross sections. 48 The character of transitions in ferri-and ferrocyanide was assigned based on ref. 40 .…”
Section: X-ray Absorption Of Ferri and Ferrocyanide Ions In The Flow mentioning
confidence: 99%