1978
DOI: 10.2514/3.60863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on "Reply by Author to A. H. Flax"

Abstract: C HOPRA, 1 in his Reply to my Comment 2 on his Note, 3 seems to have missed one of the main points of my remarks. He states that, for the special cases of supersonic panel flutter which he treated, his procedures given in Ref. 1 will lead to the same results as those indicated in Ref. 2, the two procedures being merely alternative ways of arriving at the same answer. This is not the case. In fact, Chopra's new interpretation 1 of the formulas he presented in Ref. 3 leads to a recipe which cannot be carried out… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Publication Types

Select...

Relationship

0
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 0 publications
references
References 3 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance

No citations

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?