2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on P. Nouvellet, J.P. Bacon, D. Waxman, “Testing the level of ant activity associated with quorum sensing: An empirical approach leading to the establishment and test of a null-model”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion was challenged by Nouvellet et al [68], who performed new experiments where the exit process could more simply be described by standard Poisson statistics, the result expected if the ants move randomly and independently in and out of their nest. The question is of course whether the two sets of experiments really were equivalent [69]. More important from our vantage point is the mecha-nism producing the gradual entrenchment of dynamical trajectories in more long-lived metastable configurations.…”
Section: Movement In Ant Coloniesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conclusion was challenged by Nouvellet et al [68], who performed new experiments where the exit process could more simply be described by standard Poisson statistics, the result expected if the ants move randomly and independently in and out of their nest. The question is of course whether the two sets of experiments really were equivalent [69]. More important from our vantage point is the mecha-nism producing the gradual entrenchment of dynamical trajectories in more long-lived metastable configurations.…”
Section: Movement In Ant Coloniesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results could be described by a 'null' model, where ants act independently and where the activity is described by a standard Poisson process, as fitting for a stationary and time homogeneous situation. In their reply [7], Richardson et al stressed that the two sets of experiments were performed under different conditions and claimed that this would lead to different event statistics. For completeness, we also mention that Nouvellet et al recently replied [8] to the comment of Richardson et al. The discussion between the two groups raises two important theoretical issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%