2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on “John’s stone: A possible fragment of the 1908 Tunguska meteorite” (Anfinogenov et al., 2014, Icarus 243, 139–147)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The boulder, formed by sandstone (or conglomerate), as well as its fragments collected in soil, was partly coated with thin glass. The authors [33] calculated that the stone had to hit the ground with a velocity higher than 500 m/s (they suggested that it could represent a new type of meteorite, which however is inconsistent with its chemical and isotopic composition [34]). Therefore, that stone may represent a secondary projectile.…”
Section: Disequilibrium Character Of Melting and Evaporation And Its ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The boulder, formed by sandstone (or conglomerate), as well as its fragments collected in soil, was partly coated with thin glass. The authors [33] calculated that the stone had to hit the ground with a velocity higher than 500 m/s (they suggested that it could represent a new type of meteorite, which however is inconsistent with its chemical and isotopic composition [34]). Therefore, that stone may represent a secondary projectile.…”
Section: Disequilibrium Character Of Melting and Evaporation And Its ...mentioning
confidence: 99%